Court of Appeal
New South Wales
Case Title: Tanious v Public Guardian Medium Neutral Citation: [2012] NSWCA 165 Hearing Date(s): 28 May 2012 Decision Date: 28 May 2012 Jurisdiction: Before: Macfarlan JA
Decision: (1) Direct that the name of the first respondent in the title to the proceedings be changed to the Public Guardian.
(2) Dismiss the appeal.
(3) Order the appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: APPEAL - application for summary dismissal - notice of appeal disclosing no arguable ground of appeal - appeal dismissed pursuant to UCPR r 13.14 - powers of a single judge of appeal - no issue of principle
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Supreme Court Act 1970
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005Cases Cited: Australian Executor Trustees Limited v Pachkovski [2011] NSWCA 23
Texts Cited: Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mofeed Tanious (Appellant)
Judy Hunt (First Respondent)
Irini Moza (Second Respondent)Representation - Counsel: Counsel:
Appellant in person
J McDonnell (Solicitor) (First Respondent)- Solicitors: Solicitors:
Appellant in person
Crown Solicitor's Office (First Respondent)File number(s): CA 2012/50000
Decision Under Appeal - Court / Tribunal: - Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President L Goodchild, Judicial Member M Bolt, Non-Judicial Member - Date of Decision: 02 February 2012 - Citation: [2012] NSWADTAP (GD) 3 - Court File Number(s) 119037 Publication Restriction:
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: By Notice of Motion filed on 11 April 2012, the Public Guardian, Ms Judy Hunt, seeks an order dismissing the appeal in this matter. I should say at the outset that Ms Hunt should not have been joined as a party to the appeal in her own name rather than that of her office. I will direct therefore that the name of the first respondent to the appeal be changed to the Public Guardian.
Mr Tanious brings his appeal pursuant to s 119 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, which permits him to appeal only "on a question of law." The decision against which he appeals is described in my judgment of 16 March 2012 in this matter ([2012] NSWCA 51).
Mr Tanious' grounds of appeal are as follows:
"(1) On 12-01-2011 the Public Guardian was appointed to make decision on behalf of my father Mr Lawis Moza date of birth 23-01-1921 concerning his accommodation, health care, and medical treatment according to an order from the Guardianship Tribunal for 12 months.
(2) The Guardianship tribunal order was made on false evidence provided by a doctor specialised in geriatric and thoracic medicine. At the time psychiatrist and psychologist are legally the responsible specialist to report…
Continue reading Tanious v Public Guardian
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tanious v Public Guardian [2012] NSWCA 165
- Case
- [2012] NSWCA 165
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the appellant's notice of appeal disclosed any arguable ground, thereby necessitating its dismissal pursuant to rule 13.14 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). This rule permits a single judge of appeal to dismiss an appeal if it appears that the appeal does not involve any question of principle and has no reasonable prospect of success.
Macfarlan JA reasoned that the appellant's notice of appeal failed to identify any arguable ground that would warrant further consideration by the Court of Appeal. The judge applied the principles governing summary dismissal of appeals, which require the appeal to raise a question of principle or have a reasonable prospect of success. Finding neither to be present, the judge concluded that the appeal should be dismissed.
The court ordered that the name of the first respondent be amended to the Public Guardian, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Direct that the name of the first respondent in the title to the proceedings be changed to the Public Guardian.
(2) Dismiss the appeal.
(3) Order the appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.