Tang & Keats
Case
•
[2016] FamCA 99
•25 February 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Tang & Keats [2016] FamCA 99
[2016] FamCA 99
25 February 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Family Court of Australia, Justice Cronin considered an application for costs against the wife and her solicitor, Ms Gault, in proceedings between a husband and wife. The dispute concerned costs thrown away, with the husband seeking an order for these costs against both the wife and her legal representative.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife and her solicitor should be held jointly and severally liable for the husband's costs thrown away. This required the court to consider the circumstances that led to the costs being incurred and the conduct of the parties, particularly the wife and her solicitor, in relation to those costs.
Justice Cronin reasoned that the wife and Ms Gault were jointly and severally liable for the husband's costs thrown away, fixing this amount at $10,100. The court also made directions regarding the adjournment of applications for final orders, setting a two-day hearing for 4 August 2016. Further orders stipulated timelines for the filing and service of affidavit material by both the wife and the husband, and allowed for the issuance of subpoenas subject to usual conditions. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife and her solicitor should be held jointly and severally liable for the husband's costs thrown away. This required the court to consider the circumstances that led to the costs being incurred and the conduct of the parties, particularly the wife and her solicitor, in relation to those costs.
Justice Cronin reasoned that the wife and Ms Gault were jointly and severally liable for the husband's costs thrown away, fixing this amount at $10,100. The court also made directions regarding the adjournment of applications for final orders, setting a two-day hearing for 4 August 2016. Further orders stipulated timelines for the filing and service of affidavit material by both the wife and the husband, and allowed for the issuance of subpoenas subject to usual conditions. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Discovery
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Tang & Keats [2016] FamCA 99
Most Recent Citation
Demara and Demara (Costs) [2017] FCWA 40
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Weldon and Levitt (No.2)
[2018] FCCA 436
Laurens and Laurens (No.2)
[2017] FCCA 109
Jarbin and Yabes (Costs)
[2017] FCWA 73