Tallant and Kelsey

Case [2016] FamCA 538


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TALLANT & KELSEY [2016] FamCA 538
FAMILY LAW – EVIDENCE – Admissibility – Expert report.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60CC, 69ZR, 69ZT.
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 15.44, 15.59.

Cameron & Walker (2010) FLC 93-445

Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, Family Violence Best Practice Principles (edition 3.2, December 2015)
Family Court of Australia, Federal Circuit Court of Australia and Family Court of Western Australia,  Australian Standards of Practice for Family Assessments and Reporting (February 2015)

APPLICANT: Ms Tallant
RESPONDENT: Mr Kelsey
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Jarman
FILE NUMBER: PAC 3364 of 2013
DATE DELIVERED: 10 June 2016
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Hannam J
HEARING DATE: 6 June 2016

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Goodchild
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Women's Legal Service NSW
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Snelling
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Beck
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mills Oakley Lawyers

Orders

  1. Leave is granted to the parties, their legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents from Suburb B Local Court held in the Registry.

  2. The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 is admitted and Reasons for Judgment will be published in due course

  1. On the application of the father, the matter is adjourned to 7 June 2016 at 10:00am for the purposes of the father obtaining a medical certificate in relation to his fitness to participate in these court proceedings tomorrow and the balance of the week and in relation to any disability and application for a case guardian, if that is to be sought.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Tallant & Kelsey has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 3364  of 2013

Ms Tallant

Applicant

And

Mr Kelsey

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. In an Application in a Case determined at the commencement of parenting proceedings, I dismissed an application to have the single expert report excluded from evidence in the proceedings.  I admitted the report and indicated that I would publish reasons in due course.  These are those Reasons.

Background

  1. The mother who is 42 and the father who is 41 commenced a relationship in around 1999. 

  2. The parties began living together in 2001 or 2002 and had two daughters.  The elder child, C, was born in 2002 and is 13 at the date of the proceedings.  A second child D was born in 2011 and is almost five at the time of the proceedings. 

  3. The parents initially separated in March 2013 and final orders in relation to the future parenting of the children were made in Federal Circuit Court in December 2013.  Under those orders, the parents equally shared parental responsibility for the children who lived between the parents in a shared care arrangement. 

  4. Notwithstanding…

Continue reading Tallant and Kelsey

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tallant and Kelsey [2016] FamCA 538
Case
[2016] FamCA 538
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Tallant and Kelsey*, heard before Hannam J, the dispute concerned family law proceedings. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the orders indicate a need for document inspection and the admission of a report, suggesting ongoing litigation with significant evidentiary components.

The court was required to determine whether to grant leave for parties, their legal representatives, and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents held in the Registry of the Suburb B Local Court. Additionally, the court considered the admission of a report dated 29 June 2015, and the father's application for an adjournment to obtain medical documentation regarding his fitness to participate in proceedings and any potential disability, which might lead to an application for a case guardian.

Hannam J granted leave for the inspection of the specified documents, indicating that access to these records was deemed necessary for the proper conduct of the proceedings. The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 was admitted into evidence, signifying its relevance and admissibility. Furthermore, the court acceded to the father's application for an adjournment, scheduling the matter for 7 June 2016. This adjournment was specifically to allow the father to obtain a medical certificate concerning his fitness to participate in the proceedings for the remainder of the week and to address any disability that might necessitate the appointment of a case guardian.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Leave is granted to the parties, their legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents from Suburb B Local Court held in the Registry.

2.

The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 is admitted and Reasons for Judgment will be published in due course

3.

On the application of the father, the matter is adjourned to 7 June 2016 at 10:00am for the purposes of the father obtaining a medical certificate in relation to his fitness to participate in these court proceedings tomorrow and the balance of the week and in relation to any disability and application for a case guardian, if that is to be sought.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.