FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| TALLANT & KELSEY | [2016] FamCA 538 |
| FAMILY LAW – EVIDENCE – Admissibility – Expert report. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60CC, 69ZR, 69ZT. Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 15.44, 15.59. |
| Cameron & Walker (2010) FLC 93-445 Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, Family Violence Best Practice Principles (edition 3.2, December 2015) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Tallant |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Kelsey |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Jarman |
| FILE NUMBER: | PAC | 3364 | of | 2013 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 10 June 2016 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Parramatta |
| PLACE HEARD: | Parramatta |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Hannam J |
| HEARING DATE: | 6 June 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Goodchild |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Women's Legal Service NSW |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Ms Snelling |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Beck |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Mills Oakley Lawyers |
Orders
Leave is granted to the parties, their legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents from Suburb B Local Court held in the Registry.
The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 is admitted and Reasons for Judgment will be published in due course
On the application of the father, the matter is adjourned to 7 June 2016 at 10:00am for the purposes of the father obtaining a medical certificate in relation to his fitness to participate in these court proceedings tomorrow and the balance of the week and in relation to any disability and application for a case guardian, if that is to be sought.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Tallant & Kelsey has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
FILE NUMBER: PAC 3364 of 2013
| Ms Tallant |
Applicant
And
| Mr Kelsey |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
In an Application in a Case determined at the commencement of parenting proceedings, I dismissed an application to have the single expert report excluded from evidence in the proceedings. I admitted the report and indicated that I would publish reasons in due course. These are those Reasons.
Background
The mother who is 42 and the father who is 41 commenced a relationship in around 1999.
The parties began living together in 2001 or 2002 and had two daughters. The elder child, C, was born in 2002 and is 13 at the date of the proceedings. A second child D was born in 2011 and is almost five at the time of the proceedings.
The parents initially separated in March 2013 and final orders in relation to the future parenting of the children were made in Federal Circuit Court in December 2013. Under those orders, the parents equally shared parental responsibility for the children who lived between the parents in a shared care arrangement.
Notwithstanding…
Continue reading Tallant and Kelsey
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tallant and Kelsey [2016] FamCA 538
- Case
- [2016] FamCA 538
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether to grant leave for parties, their legal representatives, and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents held in the Registry of the Suburb B Local Court. Additionally, the court considered the admission of a report dated 29 June 2015, and the father's application for an adjournment to obtain medical documentation regarding his fitness to participate in proceedings and any potential disability, which might lead to an application for a case guardian.
Hannam J granted leave for the inspection of the specified documents, indicating that access to these records was deemed necessary for the proper conduct of the proceedings. The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 was admitted into evidence, signifying its relevance and admissibility. Furthermore, the court acceded to the father's application for an adjournment, scheduling the matter for 7 June 2016. This adjournment was specifically to allow the father to obtain a medical certificate concerning his fitness to participate in the proceedings for the remainder of the week and to address any disability that might necessitate the appointment of a case guardian.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Leave is granted to the parties, their legal representatives and the Independent Children’s Lawyer to inspect documents from Suburb B Local Court held in the Registry.
2.
The report of Mr R dated 29 June 2015 is admitted and Reasons for Judgment will be published in due course
3.
On the application of the father, the matter is adjourned to 7 June 2016 at 10:00am for the purposes of the father obtaining a medical certificate in relation to his fitness to participate in these court proceedings tomorrow and the balance of the week and in relation to any disability and application for a case guardian, if that is to be sought.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.