Takwood Pty Ltd

Case

[2016] FWCA 2487

19 April 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 2487

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Takwood Pty Ltd t/a Bellis Industrial Services
(AG2016/2626)

TAKWOOD PTY LTD T/A BELLIS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GORGON

PROJECT BARROW ISLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER ROE MELBOURNE, 19 APRIL 2016

Application for approval of the Takwood Pty Ltd t/a Bellis Industrial Services Gorgon Project

Barrow Island Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1]        An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the

Takwood Pty Ltd t/a Bellis Industrial Services Gorgon Project Barrow Island Enterprise

Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair

Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Takwood Pty Ltd t/a Bellis Industrial Services.

The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2]        I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to

this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the

employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and

(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3]        The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union”

known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining

representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the

Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the

organisation.
[2016] FWCA 2487

[4]        The Agreement was approved on 19 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will

operate from 26 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE418647 PR579248>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0