Takirau Figure v Johnny Bigg Pty Limited

Case [2023] FWC 1824


[2023] FWC 1824

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Takirau Figure
v

Johnny Bigg PTY Limited

(U2023/5926)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 25 JULY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 1 July 2023 Mr Takirau Figure made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that Mr Figure did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 5 July 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Figure’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.

  1. On 10 July 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Figure’s nominated email address reminding him that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received, the application may be dismissed.

  1. A final attempt to contact Mr Figure on his nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 13 July 2023 to obtain the required payment. Mr Figure advised that he had been trying to seek legal advice and that he wished to proceed with his application. The Commission warned Mr Figure that if he did not contact the Commission by 16 July 2023 to make payment or to advise that he wished to discontinue, the application may be dismissed. An SMS notification was also sent to Mr Figure’s nominated telephone number with a link to a page which may have offered him legal advice.

  1. To date there has been no response from Mr Figure, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.


COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR764548>

Details
AGLC
Takirau Figure v Johnny Bigg Pty Limited [2023] FWC 1824
Case
[2023] FWC 1824
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Takirau Figure lodged an application with the Fair Work Commission (FWC) seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal against Johnny Bigg Pty Limited, pursuant to section 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was incomplete as Mr. Figure failed to pay the required filing fee or submit a completed waiver form. Despite multiple attempts by the FWC to contact Mr. Figure, including email and SMS notifications, he did not respond or take the necessary steps to address the deficiencies in his application.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the application complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act, specifically regarding the payment of the application fee or the submission of a waiver form, and whether the application had any reasonable prospect of success. Given the absence of the required fee and waiver form, the Commission determined that the application did not comply with the Act, leading to its dismissal under section 587(1)(a).

The Commission concluded that the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act due to the failure to pay the prescribed fee. Consequently, the application was dismissed as it did not meet the procedural prerequisites for consideration. The Commission's decision was based on the clear statutory requirements outlined in sections 395 and 587(1)(a) of the FW Act, which mandate that applications must be accompanied by the requisite fee or a completed waiver form and that applications not complying with these provisions may be dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.