Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 757


[2014] FWCA 757

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12818)

TAKA'S KITCHEN (BARRACK) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Restaurants

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 4 FEBRUARY 2014

Application for approval of the Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Taka’s Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Taka’s Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement is to cover 18 employees who are employed at the applicant’s restaurant in Perth, Western Australia.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 9 September 2013, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place between 9 and 11 December 2013. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a ballot, all 15 of the employees who voted, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 24 December 2013, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr S Nukumizu, Company Director identified the Restaurant Industry Award 2010 [MA000119] and the Restaurant, Tearoom and Catering Workers’ Award, 1979 [AN160276] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Nukumizusaid that the Agreement provides for a number of conditions that are in excess of, or are more beneficial than the terms of the relevant reference instruments and that there are no less beneficial terms. The Agreement provides for higher rates of pay. Base rates of pay under the Agreement are to be adjusted in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decisions, although where an employee’s ordinary rate of pay is higher than that prescribed in the Agreement, that increase may be absorbed. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at Part 7, clauses 2 and 3 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at Part 7, clause 1 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 22 January 2014, 21 January 2014, Mr G Lilleyman of Employment Services & Solutions Australia Pty Ltd,appeared with Ms A Nukumizu for the applicant. The application was heard in conjunction with two other applications in relation to the approval of enterprise agreements covering restaurants in Perth and Fremantle, Western Australia; See: Taka’s Kitchen (Fremantle) Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 753; and Taka’s Kitchen Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 756. Mr Lilleyman outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that the rates of pay between the enterprise agreements differed slightly due to different rosters at each location, but they were essentially in the same terms. He noted that the rates of pay were 30-40c above those under the reference instruments. Ms Nukumizu said that employees do not generally interchange between the three restaurants.

[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Taka’s Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 29 January 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 1 July 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE406637  PR547316>

Details
AGLC
Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 757
Case
[2014] FWCA 757
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd applied for approval of the Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013. The applicant sought to have the agreement approved under section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement, which was made between the applicant employer and the Retail and Hospitality Workers Union, represented the applicant's employees. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including being in the best interests of the employees and not being contrary to public policy.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for a fair and equitable resolution of the employment terms and conditions, whether it complied with the Fair Work Act, and whether it was made in good faith. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement met the "better off overall test" and if it was consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement provided for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms and if it aligned with the principles of the Fair Work Act.

The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and equitable terms and conditions, was made in good faith, and met the "better off overall test". The Commission also determined that the agreement was consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and provided for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met the necessary legal standards and was in the best interests of the employees.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Taka's Kitchen (Barrack) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013, recognising that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and equitable terms and conditions, was made in good faith, and met the "better off overall test". The Commission also determined that the agreement was consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act and provided for appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. The approval of the agreement is a significant outcome for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that their employment terms and conditions are governed by a legally compliant and fair agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.