| [2016] FWCA 639 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Tabor College Inc T/A Tabor Adelaide
(AG2015/7665)
TABOR ADELAIDE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 1 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Tabor Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tabor Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Tabor College Inc T/A Tabor Adelaide. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 February 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE417637 PR576591>
- AGLC
- Tabor College Inc T/A Tabor Adelaide [2016] FWCA 639
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 639
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the Tabor Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2014 satisfied the statutory requirements for approval, particularly whether it met the "better off overall" and "no disadvantage" tests. The "better off overall" test required that the agreement provided employees with a package of terms and conditions that were at least as good as those under their previous agreement or applicable law. The "no disadvantage" test mandated that no employee should be worse off as a result of the agreement.
The Commission evaluated the agreement by comparing it to the previous enterprise agreement and the applicable awards. It considered the changes proposed in the new agreement, including alterations to wages, hours, and other conditions of employment. The Commission found that while some employees might experience minor disadvantages, the overall package provided by the new agreement was at least as good as the previous one, thereby satisfying the "better off overall" test. The Commission also concluded that the agreement did not place any employee in a position worse than they were before, thus meeting the "no disadvantage" test. Based on this analysis, the Commission approved the Tabor Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.