T&T Investments Australia Pty Limited v CGU Insurance Limited (No 2)
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 372
•21 December 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
T&T Investments Australia Pty Limited v CGU Insurance Limited (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 372
[2016] NSWCA 372
21 December 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
T&T Investments Australia Pty Limited (the appellant) sought an order for interest on the costs awarded to it in proceedings at first instance and on appeal from CGU Insurance Limited (the respondent). The matter came before the New South Wales Court of Appeal.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the appellant was entitled to an order for interest on costs, notwithstanding that no claim for such interest had been made at first instance or on the appeal itself, and the claim was only brought after final costs orders had been made. A secondary issue concerned the impact of the appellant's conduct, which had caused a delay in the prosecution of the appeal, on any potential award of interest.
The Court reasoned that the appellant had not established a basis for departing from the usual practice of not awarding interest on costs in the absence of a specific claim being made during the substantive proceedings. Furthermore, the Court noted that the amount of interest sought was not substantial. The Court also took into account that the appellant's own conduct had contributed to the delay in the appeal being heard.
Consequently, the appellant's notice of motion seeking interest on costs was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the motion.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the appellant was entitled to an order for interest on costs, notwithstanding that no claim for such interest had been made at first instance or on the appeal itself, and the claim was only brought after final costs orders had been made. A secondary issue concerned the impact of the appellant's conduct, which had caused a delay in the prosecution of the appeal, on any potential award of interest.
The Court reasoned that the appellant had not established a basis for departing from the usual practice of not awarding interest on costs in the absence of a specific claim being made during the substantive proceedings. Furthermore, the Court noted that the amount of interest sought was not substantial. The Court also took into account that the appellant's own conduct had contributed to the delay in the appeal being heard.
Consequently, the appellant's notice of motion seeking interest on costs was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the motion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
South West Helicopters Pty Ltd v Stephenson (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 99
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
3
T&T Investments Australia Pty Limited v CGU Insurance Limited
[2016] NSWCA 227
Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd (No 2)
[2009] NSWCA 170
Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd
[2014] NSWCA 158