SZQED v Minister for Immigration
[2011] FMCA 591
•22 July 2011
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SZQED v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2011] FMCA 591 |
| MIGRATION – No appearance. |
| Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 |
| Applicant: | SZQED |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP |
| Second Respondent: | REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 802 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Raphael FM |
| Hearing date: | 22 July 2011 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 July 2011 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 22 July 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| For the Applicant: | No appearance |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Clayton Utz |
ORDERS
Application dismissed pursuant to Part 13 Rule 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the First Respondent’s costs assessed in the sum of $3,620.00.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 802 of 2011
| SZQED |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP |
First Respondent
| REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter an application was made to the court on 28 April 2011 for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. On 12 May the applicant appeared before Registrar Segal together with an interpreter where orders were made including an order that the matter would be listed for hearing at 2.15 pm on 20 July 2011. On 20 July a person on behalf of the applicant faxed into my chambers a letter which stated:
“Mr Applicant got sick and cannot attend the hearing today. He attached his medical certificate. Sorry for any convenience.
Thanks for your attention.
Best regards
Zhang.”
The accompanying medical certificate was signed by Dr Xiao Hua Lin and read:
“This is to certify Mr Applicant has URTI and will be unfit for work (patient due for the court matter, he is on Codral which may cause the dizziness) from 20.07.2011 to 20.07.2011 inclusive.”
Upon receipt of this document my associated contacted the solicitors for the respondent who indicated that they would consent to an adjournment of the matter on the basis of the medical report filed. The matter was adjourned until today, 22 July. The applicant was informed by telephone by my associate of the new hearing date. He was not present outside the court at 10.15 am and he was still not present when his name was called at 10.30 am. In the circumstances I propose to dismiss the matter for non-appearance pursuant to Part 13 Rule 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.
I order that the applicant pay the first respondent’s costs which I assess in the sum of $3,620.00.
I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Raphael FM
Date: 29 July 2011
0
0
1