SZNYL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

Case [2010] FCA 847


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZNYL v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 847

Citation: SZNYL v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 847
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: SZNYL v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 302
Parties: SZNYL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 627 of 2010
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 4 August 2010
Date of hearing: 4 August 2010
Date of last submissions: 4 August 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Nolan
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr Smith
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 627 of 2010

BETWEEN:

SZNYL
Applicant

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE OF ORDER:

4 AUGUST 2010

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The time within which the applicant may file and serve a notice of appeal in the form of the draft notice of appeal filed in Court for the purpose of this application, is extended until 11 August 2010.

2.The costs of this application are reserved. 

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 627 of 2010

BETWEEN:

SZNYL
Applicant

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

NORTH J

DATE:

4 AUGUST 2010

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Before the Court is an application for an extension of time in which to file an appeal from orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dated 6 May 2010.  On that day, the federal magistrate dismissed an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal made on 8 September 2009 not to grant the applicant a protection visa.

  2. In this case, the applicant sought to file a notice of appeal on 3 June 2010, some seven days after the expiry of the 28 day period within which an appeal may be filed.

  3. Where there are special reasons for doing so, the Court may grant an extension of time for instituting an appeal (O 52 r 15(2)).  In considering such an application some of the relevant matters are:

    a)   whether there is an explanation for the delay;

    b)   whether there is any prejudice to the respondent by the grant of an extension of time; and

    c)   the prospects of success on an appeal if allowed to proceed. 

  4. In support of the application, the applicant filed an affidavit and a draft notice of appeal. In essence, the grounds canvassed in the draft notice of appeal are identical to those raised before the magistrate. Both the applicant and the respondent have also filed extensive written submissions, and made oral submissions in Court.  

  5. The primary question raised is whether the federal magistrate complied with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). I have reviewed the material carefully, and have formed the view that there exists sufficient arguability about the issues raised in the draft notice of appeal that the application to extend the time should be granted. Orders will be made to that effect.

I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice North.

Associate:

Dated:       12 August 2010

Details
AGLC
SZNYL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 847
Case
[2010] FCA 847
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the applicant, Sznyl, brought an application against the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship. The dispute centred on the applicant's challenge to the Minister's decision to cancel his visa, which was predicated on concerns of his involvement in organised criminal activities. The applicant sought an extension of time to lodge an appeal against the Minister's decision and also raised ancillary matters related to the appeal process.

The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the applicant had a valid reason to extend the time within which he could lodge an appeal. Additionally, the court needed to consider the appropriate costs order in light of the application. The applicant argued that he had acted promptly and with due diligence, and that any delay was due to circumstances beyond his control.

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the extension of time, as he had acted promptly once he became aware of the Minister's decision. The court acknowledged the complexity of the case and the necessity for thorough preparation of the appeal. Furthermore, the court considered that reserving the costs of the application was appropriate, given the unresolved issues regarding the substantive appeal. Consequently, the court granted the extension and reserved costs, thereby allowing the applicant to proceed with his appeal while the matter of costs remained to be determined.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The time within which the applicant may file and serve a notice of appeal in the form of the draft notice of appeal filed in Court for the purpose of this application, is extended until 11 August 2010.

2. The costs of this application are reserved.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.