SZMUN v Minister for Immigration

Case

[2009] FMCA 181

5 March 2009


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZMUN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR [2009] FMCA 181
MIGRATION – Review of RRT decision – where applicant failed to appear for hearing.
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001
Applicant: SZMUN
First Respondent: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
Second Respondent: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File Number: SYG 2526 of 2008
Judgment of: Raphael FM
Hearing date: 5 March 2009
Date of Last Submission: 5 March 2009
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 5 March 2009

REPRESENTATION

For the Applicant: No appearance
Solicitors for the First Respondent:

DLA Phillips Fox

ORDERS

  1. Application dismissed pursuant to Part 13, rule 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.

  2. Applicant to pay the First Respondent's costs assessed in the sum of $3,000.00.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 2526 of 2008

SZMUN

Applicant

And

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In this matter an application was lodged with the Court seeking review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal signed on 18 August 2008 on 30 September 2008.

  2. On 23 October 2008 the applicant attended a directions hearing at this Court when the matter was set down for hearing today at 2.15 pm.  The applicant did not file any amended application nor did he indicate that he had changed his address from that given in the application.  According to an affidavit of Alison Lena Faron dated 25 February 2009, a letter was sent to the applicant containing the respondent's written submissions and a reminder of the hearing date on 24 February 2009.

  3. The applicant was not in attendance when the case was due to commence at 2.15 pm, and neither was he in attendance when his name was called outside the Court at 2.35 pm. In the circumstances I dismiss the matter pursuant to Part 13, rule 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules2001. The Applicant is to pay the respondent's costs which I assess in the sum of $3,000.00.

I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Raphael FM.

Associate: 

Date:  6 March 2009

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1