SZMNA v Minister for Immigration

Case

[2008] FMCA 1311

22 August 2008


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZMNA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR [2008] FMCA 1311
MIGRATION – Persecution – review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision – application – dismissed for non-attendance.
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, r.13.03A
Applicant: SZMNA
First Respondent: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
Second Respondent: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File Number: SYG 1794 of 2008
Judgment of: Cameron FM
Hearing date: 22 August 2008
Date of Last Submission: 22 August 2008
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 22 August 2008

REPRESENTATION

No appearance by the Applicant
Solicitors for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore

ORDERS

  1. Pursuant to r.13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 the application be dismissed.

  2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of $1,500.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 1794 of 2008

SZMNA

Applicant

And

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. It is now 9:34am and there has been no appearance by or for the applicant. This is the second occasion on which the matter has come before the Court for directions. On the first occasion on 18 August 2008, the applicant failed to appear. At that time the matter was stood over to today for further directions. The Court wrote to the applicant that day by express post advising him of today’s date. Similarly, the first respondent’s solicitors wrote to the applicant that day, also by express post. A copy of the letter from the Minister’s solicitors to the applicant is Exhibit 1 on the application which the Minister has made for the proceedings to be dismissed pursuant to r.13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.

  2. In that letter from the Minister’s solicitors the following appears:

    If you do not attend on this occasion the first respondent will seek orders from the Court that your matter be dismissed and that you pay the Minister’s legal costs of the proceedings.

  3. It should be noted that the matter was called outside the Court today at 9:30am and there was no appearance and the applicant made no response to the call.

  4. As this is the second occasion on which the applicant has failed to appear and also the second occasion on which he has not given any explanation to the Court for his absence, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to dismiss the proceedings as sought by the Minister. Consequently, pursuant to r.13.03A(c) the application will be dismissed.

I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Cameron FM

Associate: 

Date:  18 September 2008

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1