SZKMQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2009] FCA 1326
•2 NOVEMBER 2009
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZKMQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2009] FCA 1326
SZKMQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 722 of 2009
RARES J
2 NOVEMBER 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 722 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZKMQ
AppellantAND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First RespondentREFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
RARES J
DATE OF ORDER:
2 NOVEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the appeal be dismissed for the failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.
2.The appellant pay the first respondent’s costs.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 722 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZKMQ
AppellantAND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First RespondentREFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
RARES J
DATE:
2 NOVEMBER 2009
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)
When this appeal was called outside the Court this morning the appellant did not appear. Ms Knight, a solicitor for the Minister, swore an affidavit on 29 October 2009 that the movement records maintained by the Minister indicated that the appellant had departed Australia on 9 September 2009 while then holding a bridging visa. I have been informed today that such a visa would have been issued automatically to the appellant in consequence of the pendency of his appeal.
The Minister seeks that I make an order under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) that the appeal be dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal in light of his non-appearance today and having regard to the contents of Ms Knight’s affidavit. I am satisfied that I should make such an order.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Rares. Associate:
Dated: 17 November 2009
Solicitor for the First Respondent: A Markus of the Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 2 November 2009 Date of Judgment: 2 November 2009
0
0
0