SZJFD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

Case [2007] FCA 1210


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZJFD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
[2007] FCA 1210

SZJFD v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

NSD 748 OF 2007

RARES J

1 AUGUST 2007

SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 748 OF 2007

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

SZJFD
Appellant

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE OF ORDER:

1 AUGUST 2007

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1Pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.

2         The appellant is to pay the first respondent’s costs, fixed in the sum of $2,000.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 748 OF 2007

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN:

SZJFD
Appellant

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE:

1 AUGUST 2007

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. When this appeal was called at 2.15 pm today, the appellant did not appear.  I asked the solicitor for the Minister to contact the appellant on the mobile phone number given in the notice of appeal with the assistance of the interpreter who was present for the purposes of the appeal.  That occurred.  Mr Johnson, who appears for the Minister, and the interpreter have informed me that they spoke with the appellant.  The appellant said that he was ill, and too ill to contact the court to inform it as to his inability to be present today.  Neither Mr Johnson nor the interpreter was able to express any lay view as to whether the appellant sounded ill.  The Minister has asked that I proceed to determine the appeal.

  2. In my opinion, it is appropriate, rather than to deal with the substantive appeal, to exercise my power under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act1976 (Cth) to dismiss the appeal on the failure of the appellant to attend the hearing. I propose to do that and to make an order for costs.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Rares.

Associate:

Dated:        10 August 2007

Appellant: No appearance
Solicitor for the Respondent: G Johnson of DLA Phillips Fox
Date of Hearing: 1 August 2007
Date of Judgment: 1 August 2007
Details
AGLC
SZJFD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1210
Case
[2007] FCA 1210
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved SZJFD, the appellant, and the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, the respondent. The dispute centred around an appeal against a decision made by the Minister regarding the appellant's visa application. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with considering the merits of the appeal and determining whether the original decision should be upheld or overturned.

The central legal issue the court had to decide was whether the appellant's failure to attend the hearing of the appeal warranted the dismissal of the appeal under section 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate costs to be awarded to the respondent in light of the appellant's non-attendance.

The court found that the appellant's non-attendance at the hearing was a sufficient ground for dismissing the appeal under the relevant section of the Act. The court noted that the appellant had been provided with ample notice and opportunity to attend the hearing, yet chose not to do so. The court also considered it appropriate to award costs to the respondent, reflecting the appellant's failure to attend and the resultant wasted expenditure on the part of the respondent. The court ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs in the sum of $2,000.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.

2 The appellant is to pay the first respondent’s costs, fixed in the sum of $2,000.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.