SZHKJ v Minister for Immigration
[2007] FMCA 320
•7 March 2007
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SZHKJ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2007] FMCA 320 |
| MIGRATION – No appearance. |
| Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 |
| Applicant: | SZHKJ |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP |
| Second Respondent: | REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File number: | SYG 3061 of 2005 |
| Judgment of: | Raphael FM |
| Hearing date: | 7 March 2007 |
| Date of last submission: | 7 March 2007 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 7 March 2007 |
REPRESENTATION
| For the Applicant: | No appearance |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Sparke Helmore |
ORDERS
Application dismissed pursuant to Part 13 Rule 13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.
Applicant to pay the first respondent’s costs assessed in the sum of $2,800.00.
The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 3061 of 2005
| SZHKJ |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP |
First Respondent
| REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant in this matter, who did not appear before the Refugee Review Tribunal, did not appear at the time at which this case is set down for hearing, namely 10.15 am on 7 March 2007. The court file reveals that the applicant attended a callover of his case at 3.15 pm on 3 March 2006 and was aided by a Mandarin interpreter. The applicant speaks Mandarin. Although he is a national of South Korea he has lived in China for many years.
The applicant was not in attendance when his name was called outside the court at 10.33 am and in those circumstances I propose to dismiss his application pursuant to Part 13 Rule 13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001. I order that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs which I assess in the sum of $2,800.00. I also order that the name of the first respondent be changed to the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.
I certify that the preceding two (2) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Raphael FM
Associate:
Date:
0
0
1