SZHGX v Minister for Immigration

Case

[2007] FMCA 170

15 February 2007


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZHGX v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION [2007] FMCA 170
MIGRATION – No appearance by the applicant.
Migration Act 1958
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, Part 13 Rule 13.03A(c)
Applicant: SZHGX
Respondent: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
File Number: SYG 2849 of 2005
Judgment of: Raphael FM
Hearing date: 15 February 2007
Date of Last Submission: 15 February 2007
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 15 February 2007

REPRESENTATION

No appearance by the applicant
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M. Cleary
Solicitors for the Respondent: Clayton Utz

ORDERS

  1. Application dismissed pursuant to Part 13, Rule 13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.

  2. Applicant to pay the respondent’s costs assessed in the sum of $4000.00.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 2849 of 2005

SZHGX

Applicant

And

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. These proceedings were commenced by way of an application filed in this court on 5 October 2005 signed by the applicant. On 8 November 2005 the applicant appears to have attended a directions hearing before Registrar McIllhatton when the matter was set down for call-over on 24 February 2006.

  2. On 24 February 2006 the applicant attended the call-over and signed consent orders before Registrar Tesoriero which set the case down for hearing at 10.15 am today.

  3. The applicant did not attend the hearing before the Refugee Review Tribunal although he had completed a response to hearing invitation found at [CB62] indicating that he did wish to attend.

  4. The applicant did not attend the hearing of this case at 10.15a.m and was not present when his name was called at 10.30a.m and is still not present at the time of my giving this decision at 10.35a.m. The applicant not being present, I propose to dismiss the proceedings pursuant to Part 13 Rule 13.03A(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001.

  5. I order that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs which I assess in the sum of $4000.

I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Raphael FM.

Associate: 

Date: 

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2