FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFJF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1536
MIGRATION – no point of principle
SZFJF v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 1909 OF 2005MOORE J
31 OCTOBER 2005
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD1909 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
SZFJF
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:
31 OCTOBER 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
2.The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD1909 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
SZFJF
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE:
31 OCTOBER 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the Federal Magistrate of 16 September 2005. The applicant sought to challenge in the Federal Magistrates Court a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") of 1 November 2004.
The applicant is an Indonesian national of Muslim faith. He claimed to have a well founded fear of persecution, at the hands of Christian Catholics, were he to return to Indonesia. The Tribunal did not accept that claim. The applicant was unable to demonstrate jurisdictional error before the Federal Magistrate. In those circumstances the Federal Magistrate dismissed the application summarily.
The applicant in this Court has not identified any arguable jurisdictional error on the part of the Tribunal. Indeed, he candidly conceded that what he sought to achieve was an opportunity to remain in Australia for some further period of time. I propose to dismiss the application for leave to appeal with costs.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore. Associate:
Dated: 16 November 2005
The Applicant appeared in person. Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 31 October 2005 Date of Judgment: 31 October 2005
- AGLC
- SZFJF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1536
- Case
- [2005] FCA 1536
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated that the decision made by the Minister was legally flawed. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the Minister's decision was unreasonable or if there were procedural errors that warranted a review. The applicant argued that the decision was based on an incorrect interpretation of the Migration Act and that there were procedural irregularities in the decision-making process.
The court examined the application and found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the decision was legally flawed or that the Minister had acted outside their jurisdiction. The court held that the Minister's decision was well within the scope of their powers and that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to suggest otherwise. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for leave to appeal and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MOORE J
Full text does not contain this section.