FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SZEIV & ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2005] FMCA 1702 |
| MIGRATION – Review of decision by Refugee Review Tribunal – refusal to grant protection visa – applicants claim persecution in Fiji on the basis of race. |
| Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s.39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.5(1); 36(2); 65(1); 91R; 91S; 417; 417(1); 422B; 474; 483A |
| First Applicant: | SZEIV |
| Second Applicant: | SZEIW |
| Third Applicant: | SZEIX |
| Fourth Applicant: | SZEIY |
| Fifth Applicant: | SZEIZ |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 2765 of 2004 |
| Judgment of: | Emmett FM |
| Hearing date: | 24 October 2005 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 24 October 2005 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 22 November 2005 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr A. Kumar |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms S. McNaughton |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Mr I. Muthalib, Blake Dawson Waldron |
ORDERS
That the Applicants be granted leave to add as a Second Respondent nunc pro tunc the Refugee Review Tribunal.
That the Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as Second Respondent.
That the applications before this Court are dismissed.
That the Applicants pay the costs of the First Respondent in the amount of $7275.00.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 2765 OF 2004
| SZEIV |
First Applicant
| SZEIW |
Second Applicant
| SZEIX |
Third Applicant
| SZEIY |
Fourth Applicant
| SZEIZ |
Fifth Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
| REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application pursuant to s.39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and s.483A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Act”) for judicial review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) to affirm the decision of the delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (“the Delegate”) not to grant a protection visa to the Applicant.
The Applicants are citizens of Fiji and comprise a family of two parents and three daughters. The Applicants arrived in Australia on
10 January 1999. On 15 November 2002, the Applicants lodged an application for protection visas which were refused by the Delegate on 23 December 2002.
On 12 January 2003, the Applicants lodged with the Tribunal an application for review of the Delegate’s decision. On 29 October 2003, the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the Applicants protection visas.
The Applicants’ claims before the Tribunal
The Applicants claimed that they had leased and occupied some 15 acres…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SZEIV v Minister for Immigration and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] FMCA 1702
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide included whether the applicants were entitled to add the Refugee Review Tribunal as a second respondent, whether the tribunal's decision was flawed, and whether the Minister's decision to cancel the applicants' visa was lawful. The court had to consider the relevant legislation, regulations, and case law to determine these issues.
The court found that the applicants were not entitled to add the Refugee Review Tribunal as a second respondent as the tribunal's decision was not a relevant decision for the purposes of the judicial review jurisdiction of the court. The court also found that the Minister's decision to cancel the applicants' visa was lawful, as the applicants had not satisfied the criteria for a protection visa. The court dismissed the applications and ordered the applicants to pay the costs of the Minister.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the Applicants be granted leave to add as a Second Respondent nunc pro tunc the Refugee Review Tribunal.
2.
That the Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as Second Respondent.
3.
That the applications before this Court are dismissed.
4.
That the Applicants pay the costs of the First Respondent in the amount of $7275.00.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.