SZEFM & Anor v MIMIA

[2006] HCATrans 507

[2006] HCATrans 507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S71 of 2006

B e t w e e n -

SZEFM

First Applicant

SZEFN

Second Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CRENNAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 7 SEPTEMBER 2006, AT 9.10 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

HAYNE J:   The applicants are husband and wife. Each is a citizen of India. They seek special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (Bennett J) exercising the appellate jurisdiction of that Court. By those orders, Bennett J dismissed the applicants’ appeal against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing the applicants’ application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) in respect of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal affirming the refusal by a delegate of the Minister to grant them protection visas.

Because the applicants are unrepresented, the application for special leave to appeal to this Court falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of Bennett J.

Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.11 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED