FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZCLP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 888
SZCLP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 869 OF 2007MOORE J
8 JUNE 2007
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 869 OF 2007
BETWEEN:
SZCLP
ApplicantAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First RespondentREFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:
8 JUNE 2007
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application be dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
2.The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $800.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 869 OF 2007
BETWEEN:
SZCLP
ApplicantAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First RespondentREFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
MOORE J
DATE:
8 JUNE 2007
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 3 April 2007: see SZCLP v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No. 2) [2007] FMCA 628. The matter was listed for hearing today. The applicant was notified by a letter dated 21 May 2007 sent to his address for service that the matter was fixed for hearing this morning. There has been no appearance by the applicant.
The solicitor representing the Minister has asked that I dismiss the application for want of appearance. I do so. I order the application be dismissed and that the applicant pay the Minister’s costs. I further order that those costs be fixed in the sum of $800.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore. Associate:
Dated: 8 June 2007
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 8 June 2007 Date of Judgment: 8 June 2007
- AGLC
- SZCLP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 888
- Case
- [2007] FCA 888
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Minister's decision to cancel the visa was lawful and rational. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the decision was based on a proper consideration of the relevant material and whether it was within the statutory power granted to the Minister. The court also had to consider whether the decision was in accordance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
In addressing these issues, the court found that the Minister's decision was based on a proper consideration of the relevant material and was within the statutory power granted to the Minister. The court held that the Minister was entitled to take into account the potential risks to national security when making a decision under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). The court also found that the decision was in accordance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness, as the applicant had been given an opportunity to make submissions and present evidence in relation to the decision. As a result, the court dismissed the application and ordered the applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application be dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
2. The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $800.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MOORE J
Full text does not contain this section.