SZBGH v MIMIA; SZBGG v MIMIA

[2005] HCATrans 950

[2005] HCATrans 950

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S168 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

SZBGH

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Office of the Registry
  Sydney  No S169 of 2005

B e t w e e n -

SZBGG

Applicant

and

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

Applications for special leave to appeal

Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders

HAYNE J
CALLINAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 17 NOVEMBER 2005, AT 9.33 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

__________________

HAYNE J:   The applicant in the second of these two applications for special leave is husband and father of the applicants in the first.  It is convenient to deal with the applications together.  Application is made for special leave to appeal against orders of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (exercising the appellate jurisdiction of that Court).  By those orders appeals against orders of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing applications for constitutional writs and associated relief were dismissed.

Because the applicants are unrepresented, the applications fall to be dealt with under rule 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decisions of the Federal Court of Australia.  Appeals against those orders would enjoy no prospect of success.

Pursuant to rule 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing each application. I publish that disposition.

AT 9.34 AM THE MATTERS WERE CONCLUDED