SZBFL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2005] FCA 607


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZBFL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 607

SZBFL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 439 of 2005

ALLSOP J
12 MAY 2005
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 439 of 2005

ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A FEDERAL MAGISTRATE

BETWEEN:

SZBFL
APPELLANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE OF ORDER:

12 MAY 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. On or before 17 June 2005 the appellant file and serve:
    1. an amended notice of appeal with adequate particulars setting out the grounds of appeal; and

b.   full written submissions in support of the appeal including but not limited to any submissions as to whether one Judge or three Judges should hear the appeal.

  1. Subject to order 3, the matter stand over to Friday, 24 June 2005 at 2.15pm for directions.
  2. If order 1 is not complied with, the Court will hear the appellant at 2.15pm on 24 June 2005 as to why the Court should not dismiss the appeal under s 25 (2B) (bb) (i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for failure to comply with the a direction of the Court.
  3. The costs of today be reserved.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 439 of 2005

ON APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF A FEDERAL MAGISTRATE

BETWEEN:

SZBFL
APPELLANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

ALLSOP J

DATE:

12 MAY 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This matter was listed on 28 April 2005, the appellant rang my chambers and spoke to my associate shortly prior to then, advised who he was and that he had an injury which would prevent him coming to Court. There was a question of a telephone link. I indicated I would not have a telephone link but I would adjourn the matter for two weeks. The matter is in the list today at 9.00 am for directions, there was no appearance by the appellant, the matter was called three times outside by the necessary acronym by reason of s 91X of the Migration Act1958 (Cth).

  2. The notice of appeal has not a scintilla of assistance as to what the error of the learned Federal Magistrate was. This is a notice of appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court. The grounds of appeal are entirely uninformative. 

  3. I propose to make the following orders: 

    1.   On or before 17 June 2005 the appellant file and serve:

    a.   an amended notice of appeal with adequate particulars setting out the grounds of appeal; and

    b.   full written submissions in support of the appeal including but not limited to any submissions as to whether one Judge or three Judges should hear the appeal.

    2.   Subject to order 3, the matter stand over to Friday, 24 June 2005 at 2.15pm for directions.

    3.   If order 1 is not complied with, the Court will hear the appellant at 2.15pm on 24 June 2005 as to why the Court should not dismiss the appeal under s 25 (2B) (bb) (i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for failure to comply with the a direction of the Court.

    4.   The costs of today be reserved.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Allsop.

Associate:

Dated:             19 May 2005

The appellant appeared in person after the matter was called and heard.
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Carter (Slr)
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
Date of Hearing: 12 May 2005
Date of Judgment: 12 May 2005
Details
AGLC
SZBFL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 607
Case
[2005] FCA 607
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SZBFL, an individual who had been the subject of visa cancellation proceedings, sought judicial review of the decision of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs to cancel their visa. The dispute was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The appellant contested the visa cancellation on the grounds that the Minister failed to consider relevant information and that the decision was otherwise flawed. The legal issues before the court included the scope of judicial review of ministerial decisions under the Migration Act 1958, the standard of review applicable to the decision, and whether the appellant's rights under the Migration Act and the Australian Constitution had been violated. The court considered whether the Minister's decision was legally sound and whether it had been made in accordance with the law.

The court found that the appeal was prematurely filed due to the appellant's failure to adequately specify the grounds of appeal and provide full written submissions. It was determined that the appellant needed to amend the notice of appeal and furnish comprehensive submissions before the appeal could proceed. The court emphasised the importance of strict compliance with procedural requirements and highlighted the need for the appellant to articulate the grounds of appeal with particularity and to provide a full exposition of their case in writing. The court's decision underscored the necessity for clear and concise legal arguments to ensure that the appeal could be effectively heard and determined.

The court ordered the appellant to file an amended notice of appeal and written submissions by a specified date, failing which the appeal would be at risk of dismissal. The matter was subsequently adjourned to allow the court to provide further directions. The costs of the hearing were reserved pending the outcome of the appellant's compliance with the orders. This ruling reinforced the importance of procedural diligence in judicial review proceedings and set a clear path for the appellant to follow in order to pursue their appeal effectively.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. On or before 17 June 2005 the appellant file and serve:

1. an amended notice of appeal with adequate particulars setting out the grounds of appeal; and

b. full written submissions in support of the appeal including but not limited to any submissions as to whether one Judge or three Judges should hear the appeal.

2. Subject to order 3, the matter stand over to Friday, 24 June 2005 at 2.15pm for directions.

3. If order 1 is not complied with, the Court will hear the appellant at 2.15pm on 24 June 2005 as to why the Court should not dismiss the appeal under s 25 (2B) (bb) (i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for failure to comply with the a direction of the Court.

4. The costs of today be reserved.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: ALLSOP J

Full text does not contain this section.