FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZATD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1559
SZATD v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
NSD 1434 of 2004
WHITLAM J
23 NOVEMBER 2004
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1434 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
SZATD
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
23 NOVEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1434 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
SZATD
APPELLANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE:
23 NOVEMBER 2004
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court dismissing an application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 for relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’): SZATD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FMCA 586. The Tribunal’s decision, which was handed down on 14 October 2003, affirmed a decision of the respondent’s delegate refusing to grant the appellant a protection visa.
The appellant has not attended at the appointed time for the hearing today. Pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 I order that the appeal be dismissed with costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Whitlam.
Associate:
Dated: 1 December 2004
No appearance by the appellant
Counsel for the Respondent:
R J Bromwich
Solicitor for the Respondent:
Ms K Alexander from the Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing:
23 November 2004
Date of Judgment:
23 November 2004
- AGLC
- SZATD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1559
- Case
- [2004] FCA 1559
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Minister had correctly exercised his discretion to cancel SZATD's visa. SZATD argued that the Minister had erred in law by failing to consider relevant factors and by not providing adequate reasons for the decision. SZATD also contended that the decision was harsh and unreasonable. The Minister, on the other hand, maintained that the decision was well within the statutory powers granted and was supported by the evidence presented.
The court found that the Minister had exercised his discretion correctly and had provided adequate reasons for the decision. The court held that the decision was not harsh or unreasonable, as it was based on clear evidence of visa condition breaches. The court further determined that the Minister had considered all relevant factors and that SZATD had not demonstrated any error of law that would warrant interference by the court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the Minister.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: WHITLAM J
Full text does not contain this section.