SZALB v MIMIA
[2005] HCATrans 211
[2005] HCATrans 211
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S242 of 2004
B e t w e e n -
SZALB
Applicant
and
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
Application for special leave to appeal
Publication of reasons and pronouncement of orders
McHUGH J
HEYDON J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 21 APRIL 2005, AT 9.31 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
McHUGH J: The Refugee Review Tribunal rejected the claim of the applicant, a Bangladeshi, for a protection visa on the grounds that the applicant fabricated his claims that he was involved in the Freedom Party, and that the applicant did not have a well founded fear of persecution for a Convention reason.
The Federal Magistrates Court found that the Tribunal did not make a jurisdictional error and was entitled to make the findings of fact as to the applicant’s credibility.
The Federal Court dismissed an appeal on the ground that the Tribunal did not fail to take into account the appellant’s evidence nor investigate the appellant’s case.
The applicant’s special leave application complained of jurisdictional error, error of law and a breach of procedural fairness.
An appeal has no prospects of success.
The application is dismissed.
Pursuant to rule 41.11.1 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order that the application is dismissed with costs. I publish our joint reasons.
AT 9.32 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0