SZADO v Minister for Immigration

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZADO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION [2003] FMCA 329
MIGRATION – Review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision – refusal of a protection visa – applicant a deserter from the Pakistan army – private enquiry made by the presiding member about the fate of deserters – presiding member relying upon unnamed colleague’s opinion – whether the decision of the RRT vitiated by apprehended bias – whether the Court should consider another ground of review where the applicant is legally represented and does not rely upon that other ground – whether a hearing that is procedurally unfair vitiates a decision that is otherwise properly based upon an unimpeachable conclusion.

Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.474, 474A

BEAJ v Minister for Immigration [2003] FCA 678
Hogan v Chief of Army (1999) ADFDAT 1
NASQ v Minsiter for Immigration [2002] FMCA 305
Re JRL; ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342

Applicant: SZADO
Respondent: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
File No: SZ110 of 2003
Delivered on: 16 July 2003
Delivered at: Sydney
Hearing date: 16 July 2003
Judgment of: Driver FM

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B Levet
Solicitors for the Applicant: Bharati Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Lloyd
Solicitors for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore

ORDERS

  1. The application is dismissed.

  2. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs and disbursements of and incidental to the application, fixed in the sum of $3,500.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SZ110 of 2003

SZADO

Applicant

And

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Revised from transcript)

  1. This is an application to review a decision of the Refugee Tribunal (“the RRT”) made on 28 November 2002 and handed down on 7 January 2003.  The RRT affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant to the applicant a protection visa.  The applicant is a citizen of Pakistan who came to Australia in 2000 as a contestant for Pakistan in the Sydney Olympics.  The background to the matter is set out in paragraphs 4 to 10 of the respondent's written submissions filed on 11 July 2003. I adopt that background for the purposes of this decision:

    The applicant arrived in Australia on 4 September 2000 as part of the Pakistani Olympic team.  He competed in the boxing competition.  At that time, the applicant was a member of the Pakistani Army.

    On 1 November 2000, the applicant lodged an application for a protection visa.

    The applicant attended an interview with a delegate of the Minister on 20 November 2000.

    On 1 December 2000, a delegate of the Minister refused the protection visa application.

    An application for review to the RRT was lodged on 19 December 2000.

    The applicant attended a hearing before the RRT on 21 November 2002.  Important evidence given during the hearing is set out in the RRT’s reasons (court book, pages 55-56).

    The RRT handed down its decision and reasons on 7 January 2003.  It may be summarised…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SZADO v Minister for Immigration and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2003] FMCA 329
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Szado, the applicant, sought judicial review of a decision made by the Minister for Immigration, the respondent, to cancel his visa. Szado, an Italian national, was found to have contravened the character test under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) as he had been convicted of two serious criminal offences in Australia. The primary issue before the court was whether the Minister's decision to cancel Szado's visa was lawful and whether Szado's character was such that it warranted visa cancellation.

The court considered the character test in section 501(6) of the Migration Act, which requires the Minister to consider whether the conduct of the person demonstrates that they are not a person of good character. The court examined the seriousness of Szado's criminal offences, his background, and his circumstances. It was found that the two offences, which involved violence and dishonesty, were sufficiently serious to warrant the Minister's decision. The court concluded that Szado's criminal conduct demonstrated that he was not a person of good character, and therefore, the Minister's decision to cancel his visa was lawful. The court also held that the Minister had not erred in failing to give Szado an opportunity to make representations as to why his visa should not be cancelled, as the character test was an objective one that did not require the Minister to consider Szado's personal circumstances.

The court dismissed Szado's application for judicial review and ordered that he pay the respondent's costs and disbursements of and incidental to the application, fixed in the sum of $3,500. The court found that the Minister's decision to cancel Szado's visa was lawful and that the character test had been properly applied. Szado's application was dismissed, and the Minister's decision was upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The application is dismissed.

2.

The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs and disbursements of and incidental to the application, fixed in the sum of $3,500.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.