Syu (Migration)

[2020] AATA 3101

Syu (Migration) [2020] AATA 3101 (23 June 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Ms Jia-li Syu

CASE NUMBER:  1836838

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2018/4247798

MEMBER:Mark Bishop

DATE:23 June 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.

Statement made on 23 June 2020 at 10:10am

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – genuine entrant as student – current enrolment – decision under review affirmed          

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 359, 363
Migration Regulations 1994, r 1.03; Schedule 2 cls 500.211, 500.212

CASES

Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40
Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617
Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 28
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 915
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1
Yang v MIAC [2010] FMCA 890

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 13 December 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 29 September 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

3. In this case the Tribunal formally wrote to the review applicant pursuant to s.359(2) of the Act inviting the review applicant to provide further information to the Tribunal, including information in relation to enrolment: cl.500.211(a).

4. The Tribunal did not receive any response to the before mentioned written invitation. That is the review applicant has not provided the Tribunal with any further information than that which was provided to the Department.

5. The Tribunal is satisfied that the review applicant was properly sent an invitation to provide further information under s.359(2) of the Act. The invitation was sent to the review applicant’s nominated address, being an address provided by the review applicant in connection with this application for review.

6. As the applicant failed to respond within the prescribed period, s.359C(1) applies and pursuant to s.360(3), the review applicant is not entitled to appear before the Tribunal. The effect of s.363A of the Act is that if a review applicant has no entitlement to a hearing, the Tribunal has no power to permit them to appear see Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40 at [26]; Yang v MIAC [2-010] FMCA 890 at [40].

7. The Tribunal has considered whether, in the circumstances of this case, information that the review applicant meets the requirements of the Act and Regulations is likely to be forthcoming and whether the review applicant has had a fair opportunity to provide relevant information already.

8. The Tribunal has given consideration to whether it should adjourn the review under s.363(1)(b) of the Act to allow the applicant additional time in which to provide further evidence to support the review application. In doing so, the Tribunal has had regard to the decisions in Huo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617 and Manna v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 28 where the Courts have held that the Tribunal is not required to indefinitely defer its decision-making processes. It has also had regard to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA18 (8 May 2013) regarding the reasonableness of any request for an adjournment, and the Full Federal Court decision in Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC (4 February 2014) which considered analogous issues, as well as the recent decision of Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014 FCA 915 (28 August 2014).

9. In these circumstances, for the reasons set out in this decision record above, the Tribunal considers that the review applicant has had a fair opportunity to provide relevant information.

10. Accordingly, the Tribunal has decided not to exercise its discretion under s.363(1)(b) of the Act to adjourn the review any further to allow the review applicant more time. In these circumstances, the Tribunal has decided to proceed to make a decision having regard to the information it has before it, including the information previously provided by the review applicant to the Department.

11. Ultimately, a decision maker is not required to make the review applicant’s case. It is for the review applicant to satisfy the Tribunal that the requirements of the Act and Regulations have been met. Although the concept of onus of proof is not appropriate to administrative decision-making, the relevant facts of the individual case have to be supplied by the review applicant, in as much detail as is necessary to enable the examiner to establish the relevant facts.

12. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

13. The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria.

14. While the determinative issue before the delegate was whether the applicant met the genuine temporary entrant criteria under clause 500.212 of the Regulations, the material and evidence before the Tribunal indicate that he is not currently enrolled in a registered course of study.

    Enrolment (cl.500.211)

15. Clause 500.211 relevantly requires that at the time of this decision the applicant is enrolled in a course of study: cl.500.211(a). The applicant does not claim to meet any of the alternative criteria in cl.500.211.

16. ‘Course of study’ is relevantly defined in cl.500.111 of the Regulations as a ‘full-time registered course’. ‘Registered course’ is defined in r.1.03 of the Regulations as a course of education or training provided by an institution, body or person that is registered, under Division 3 of Part 2 of the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000, to provide the course to overseas students.

    Significance of Enrolment Criterion

17. Producing evidence of current enrolment is a critical first step towards obtaining a student visa. Such evidence shows that the applicant has, prior to the Tribunal making its decision, entered into a legally binding contract with a registered course provider. That contract gives rise to several significant obligations. First, it obliges the course provider to provide the applicant with a pre-determined course of education or training over a specified period. Second, it obliges the applicant to pay for the course. Third, it obliges the applicant to complete the course requirements to receive a testament from the course provider as to what the applicant has achieved by way of formal qualification. An enrolment therefore represents a present and operating commitment by the applicant to complete a course of study. It is persuasive evidence of a tangible and immediate need for a student visa.

18. An enrolment continues to be of legal significance once a student visa is issued. All student visas are subject to a condition that the visa holder remains enrolled in a registered course of study. That condition operates on a continuing basis every day the visa remains valid. If a student visa is issued to an applicant who is not enrolled in a course of study, the visa will be breached as soon as it is granted.

19. The Tribunal must therefore be presented with evidence that shows the applicant is currently enrolled in a registered course of study. Absent such evidence, a student visa cannot sensibly be grated. Indeed, in any case for a student visa, consideration of whether all other primary criteria are met, as contained in clauses 500.211-500.218 of the Regulations, is premised on the enrolment criterion in clause 500.211 first being satisfied. If clause 500.211 is not met, there is no administrative utility in the Tribunal proceeding to consider any further primary criteria.

20. Clause 500.211 provides:

    500.211 One of the following applies:

    (a) the applicant is enrolled in a course of study;

    (b) if the application is made in Australia—the applicant is

    seeking to remain in Australia because the relevant educational

    institution requires the applicant to do so during the marking of the

    applicant’s postgraduate thesis;

    (c) if the applicant is a Foreign Affairs student—the applicant

    has the support of the Foreign Minister for the grant of the visa;

    (d) if the applicant is a Defence student—the applicant has

    the support of the Defence Minister for the grant of the visa.

21. On 9 April 2020 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and advised as follows:

    · “As you applied for the visa on the basis of undertaking a course of study in Australia, it is a requirement of the visa for you to be:

    oenrolled in a registered course of study; and

    oa genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student.

    ·Accordingly, you will need to provide sufficient information to satisfy us that you meet both of these visa requirements and you are now invited to give, in writing, all relevant information about the course (s) of study you are undertaking and your entry and stay in Australia as a student… by 23 April 2020”

22. As outlined in paragraph 3 above on 9 April 2020 the Tribunal forwarded to the applicant a “Request for Student Visa Information under s.359 (2) of the Migration Act 1958”. The Tribunal asked the applicant if he had a “current Confirmation of Enrolment in a registered course of study”. The Tribunal informed the applicant in writing “not being enrolled in a registered course of study may be a reason, or part of a reason, for the Tribunal affirming the decision under review, even if this is not the same criteria or issue considered by the primary decision maker”.

23. The Tribunal is of the view the applicant was in receipt of written notice that in the review application the determinative issue was proof of enrolment in an approved course of study.

24. The applicant did not respond to this request for information made under s.359(2) of the Act.

25. On 3 June 2020 the Tribunal forwarded to the applicant a further “Request for Student Visa Information under s.359 (2) of the Migration Act 1958”. The Tribunal advised the applicant as follows:

    ·In conducting the review, we are required by the Migration Act 1958 to invite you to comment on or respond to certain information which we consider would, subject to your comments or response, be the reason, or a part of the reason, for affirming the decision under review.

    ·Please note, however, that we have not made up our mind about the information.

    ·The particulars of the information are:

    oCancellation of Confirmation-of-Enrolment (CoE) (please see the attached information below)

    ·This information is relevant to the review because clause 500.211(a) requires that you are enrolled in a course of study. This may be the determinative issue upon which the Tribunal decides your matter.

    ·If we rely on this information in making our decision, it may be a part of the reason or the reason for the Tribunal’s deciding that requirements for the visa are not met, which may then mean the decision under review and which refused to grant you the visa is affirmed.

    ·You are invited to give comments on or respond to the above information in writing. Your comments or response should be received by 17 June 2020.

26. The Tribunal attached to the Request for Information outlined in paragraph 25 above copies of relevant cancelled COE’s.

27. The applicant did not provide a written response to this further s.359(2) Request for Information.

28. Despite multiple requests the applicant has not provided a copy of a current COE or any form of proof of enrolment in an approved course to the Tribunal.

29. Crucially however, the Tribunal does not have before it current evidence that the review applicant is presently enrolled in a course of study as required by cl.500.211(a). It follows that the Tribunal is not satisfied that the review applicant is presently enrolled in a course of study as required by cl.500.211(a).

30. Accordingly, the decision under review must be affirmed.

    DECISION

31. The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.

    Mark Bishop

    Member

    Attachment – LIN 19/198 – Financial capacity instrument (extract)

    6 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—primary applicants

    (1)For the purposes of subclause 500.214(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a primary applicant must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsections (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).

    Note: For primary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument.

    (2)The evidence of financial capacity

    (a)is in the form specified in section 10; and

    (b)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of the primary applicant:

    (i) travel expenses; and

    (ii) the following living costs and expenses:

    (A)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – AUD21,041 (annual living costs); and

    (B)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and

    (iii) the following course fees, minus any amount already paid:

    (A)if the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is less than 12 months – the fees for the course of study or the remaining components of the course of study; or

    (B)If the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is more than 12 months – course fees for the first 12 months of the period study in Australia; and

    Note : The period of study is the period beginning at one of the following commencement periods and ending on the final day of the applicant’s final course of study:

    (a)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced after the date of application – on the first day of the first course of study; or

    (b)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced before the date of application – on the date of application.

    (c)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary applicant:

    (i) travel expenses; and

    (ii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – the following costs (annual living costs):

    (A)for a spouse or de facto partner - AUD7,362 and

    (B)for a dependent child - AUD3,152; and

    (iii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and

    (iv) the following school fees for each school-age dependant:

    (A)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for more than 12 months - AUD8,296 (annual school costs); or

    (B)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual school costs, calculated as specified in section 11; or

    (C)if the school-age dependant is enrolled in a course of study at a State or Territory government school where the fees have been waived, and the Primary Applicant is enrolled in a course as a doctoral degree student, a Foreign Affairs student, a Defence student or a Commonwealth sponsored student – nil.

    Note: For secondary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument

    (3)The evidence of financial capacity:

    (a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and

    (b)demonstrates that the primary applicant’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income, in the 12 months immediately before the application is made, that is:

    (i)if there is no secondary applicant– at least AUD62,222; or

    (ii)if there is a secondary applicant – at least AUD72,592.

    (4)The evidence of financial capacity is the primary applicant’s completed AASES form.

    Note: AASES form is defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations to mean for a secondary exchange student, an Acceptance Advice of Secondary Exchange Student form from the relevant State or Territory education authority, containing the following declarations:

    (a) a declaration made by the student’s exchange organisation, accepting the student;

    (b) a declaration made by the student’s parent, or the person or persons having custody of the student, agreeing to the exchange.

    (5)If the primary applicant is a Foreign Affairs student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

    (6) If the primary applicant is a Defence student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Defence.

    7 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—secondary applicants

    (1)For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant who is included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).

    (2)The evidence of financial capacity:

    (a)is in the form specified in section 10; and

    (b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder set out in subparagraphs 6(2)(b)(i) to (iii) of this Part; and

    (c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary student visa holder specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.

    (3)The evidence of financial capacity:

    (a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and

    (b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.

    (4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.

    (5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.

    (6)If:

    (a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but

    (b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;

    then the evidence of financial capacity:

    (c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the secondary applicant specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.

    8 Subclass 500 (Student) visa – secondary applicants not included in the primary student visa holder’s application

    (1) For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant (the first secondary applicant), who is not included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).

    (2) The evidence of financial capacity:

    (a)is in the form specified in section 10; and

    (b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder specified in subparagraph 6(2)(b)(ii) of this Part; and

    (c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet course fees for any component of the primary student visa holder’s course of study which will be completed while the first secondary applicant is in Australia, up to an amount equivalent to fees for 12 months of the course of study, minus any amount already paid; and

    (d)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and

    (e)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all additional secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.

    (3)The evidence of financial capacity:

    (a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and

    (b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.

    (4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.

    (5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.

    (6)If:

    (a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but

    (b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;

    then the evidence of financial capacity:

    (c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and

    (d)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.

    …

    10 Evidence of financial capacity

    The following forms of evidence of financial capacity are specified:

    (a)money deposit with a financial institution;

    (b)loan with a financial institution;

    (c)government loans;

    (d)scholarship or financial support.

    11 Pro rata equivalent

    In this Part, the pro rata equivalent of annual costs is calculated by:

    (a)dividing the annual amount by 365; and

    (b)multiplying the resulting number by the number of days the applicant is intending to stay in Australia.