Syrett v Vorbach No. DCCIV-99-336
Case
•
[2001] SADC 46
•30 March 2001
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Syrett v Vorbach No. DCCIV-99-336 [2001] SADC 46
[2001] SADC 46
30 March 2001
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Syrett v Vorbach No. DCCIV-99-336 involved the plaintiff, Syrett, seeking damages from the defendant, Vorbach, for alleged breach of contract and negligence in medical advice and treatment provided between May and July 1984. Syrett filed an application for an extension of time to bring the action, pursuant to Section 48 of the Limitation of Actions Act 1936. The key legal issue was whether the plaintiff had ascertained facts material to her case after the expiration of the limitation period and whether it was just to grant the extension of time. The court examined the evidence to determine if the facts ascertained by the plaintiff were material and if they were discovered after the limitation period. The court found that the plaintiff had indeed ascertained new material facts after the limitation period expired, specifically on 11 June 1998, 1 March 2000, 6 May 2000, and 5 September 2000. The court concluded that although some facts were ascertained after the action was commenced, it was still appropriate to exercise the discretion to extend the time for bringing the action. The court granted the extension of time and allowed the action to proceed to trial.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Breach of Contract
-
Expert Evidence
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
AUSTIN -v- ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE INC [No 2] [2013] WADC 42
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Austin v St John of God Health Care Inc [No 2]
[2013] WADC 42
Austin v St John of God Health Care Inc [No 2]
[2013] WADC 42
WEIR v WEIR
[2007] SADC 113
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Bloss Holdings Pty Ltd v Brackley Industries Pty Ltd
[2006] NSWSC 56
Sola Optical Australia Pty Ltd v Mills
[1987] HCA 57
CLT v Connon
[2000] SASC 223