SY v The King

SY
v
The King
[2022] HCASL 198
S75/2022

The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal part of a decision of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal (Hoeben CJ at CL, Price and Fagan JJ), which allowed in part an appeal against sentence from a decision of the District Court of New South Wales (Acting Judge Grogin).
The application does not raise any legal principle or question of general importance that would warrant this Court's intervention. Further, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal is not attended with sufficient doubt so as to warrant a grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave should be refused. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time sought.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

J.J. Edelman S.H.P. Steward

10 November 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of SY v The King, the applicant sought an extension of time to apply for special leave to appeal a decision of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal. This decision had allowed in part an appeal against sentence from the District Court of New South Wales. The application was made to the High Court, which needed to determine whether to grant the extension and whether special leave should be granted. The High Court was tasked with deciding whether the application raised any legal principle or question of general importance that would warrant its intervention, and whether there was sufficient doubt in the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment to warrant a grant of special leave.

The High Court considered that the application did not raise any legal principle or question of general importance that would warrant its intervention. Furthermore, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal was not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave. Consequently, the High Court concluded that special leave should be refused. The Court held that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought, as it would not result in a successful special leave application.

In light of the above, the High Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was signed and sealed by Justices J.J. Edelman and S.H.P. Steward on 10 November 2022. The High Court's decision not to grant the extension of time and to dismiss the application was based on the lack of any legal principle or question of general importance raised by the application, and the absence of sufficient doubt in the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment.

The High Court's decision in SY v The King highlights the importance of demonstrating the presence of legal principles or questions of general importance when seeking special leave to appeal. In this case, the High Court found that the application did not meet this threshold and therefore refused to grant special leave. The Court also considered the absence of sufficient doubt in the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment as a factor in its decision. The final orders of the High Court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal the order accordingly.

Keep reading for free

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established