[2018] FWCA 1625
The attached document wholly replaces the document previously issued with the code [2018] FWC 1588 on 16 March 2018 to correct document referencing.
The new document reference is:
[2018] FWCA 1625
Jenna Mercer
Associate to Senior Deputy President Hamberger
Dated 19 March 2018
| [2018] FWCA 1625 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Enterprise agreement
Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd
(AG2018/813)
SWIRE COLD STORAGE TRANSPORT NSW EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2017
Road transport industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 16 MARCH 2018 |
Termination of the Swire Cold Storage Transport NSW Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015-2017.
[1] On 5 March 2018, Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Swire Cold Storage Transport NSW Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015-2017 under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE414582 PR601304>
- AGLC
- Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 1625
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 1625
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the employer had properly exercised its right to terminate the enterprise agreement by providing the requisite notice. The Commission needed to determine if the employer had complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. This included evaluating the timing and content of the termination notice and whether it adhered to the legal standards necessary to terminate the agreement effectively.
The Commission examined the employer's actions and found that it had failed to provide the requisite notice in compliance with the statutory requirements. The employer's notice did not meet the criteria for a valid termination, as it did not include all necessary information and was not delivered within the prescribed timeframe. Consequently, the Commission ruled that the termination was invalid, and the enterprise agreement remained in effect. This decision ensured that the terms and conditions of the agreement continued to govern the employment relationship between the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.