| [2014] FWCA 7658 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7912)
SWIRE COLD STORAGE PTY LTD AND NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS SA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 28 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd and National Union of Workers SA Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd and National Union of Workers SA Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The National Union of Workers has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 4 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 July 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE410862 PR557142>
- AGLC
- Swire Cold Storage Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7658
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7658
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and compliance of specific clauses within the enterprise agreement against the Fair Work Act. The company argued that certain provisions could negatively impact operational efficiency and flexibility, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced productivity. The union, however, contended that the agreement was fair and balanced, providing necessary protections and benefits to the employees without unfairly disadvantaging the employer.
In its decision, the Commission meticulously reviewed each clause of the agreement, considering the broader context of industrial relations and the principles of fairness and reasonableness enshrined in the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that while some provisions raised legitimate concerns, they did not contravene the Act nor did they unfairly disadvantage the company. The balance between the rights of the employees and the operational needs of the company was deemed adequately addressed in the agreement. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to minor modifications to address specific concerns raised by the company, ensuring compliance with the statutory requirements and maintaining a fair balance between the parties' interests.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.