Swan v Kerr

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SWAN v KERR [2007] FMCA 1215
BANKRUPTCY – Appeal against decision of trustee refusing permission for bankrupt to travel overseas – family commitments – inquest into the death of the bankrupt’s father – bankrupt previously travelling overseas with the consent of the trustee – public examination of the trustee revealing issues of concern to the trustee – imposition of income contributions by the trustee – non payment by the bankrupt – unresolved challenge to income contribution assessment – imposition of conditions on travel by the trustee – bankrupt living itinerant lifestyle – supported by friends and relatives – appeal dismissed.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s.178
Dunwoody v Offiical Receiver [2005] FMCA 1634
ReHicks; ex Parte Lamb (1994) 217 ALR 195
Applicant: RICHARD JAMES SWAN
Respondent: DAVID KERR
File Number: SYG2197 of 2007
Judgment of: Driver FM
Hearing date: 25 July 2007
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 25 July 2007

REPRESENTATION

The Applicant appeared in person

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Spencer
Solicitors for the Respondent: Gadens Lawyers

ORDERS

  1. The application is dismissed.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG2197 of 2007

RICHARD JAMES SWAN

Applicant

And

DAVID KERR

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(revised from transcript)

  1. I have before me an application under s.178 of the Bankruptcy Act1966 (Cth) (“the Bankruptcy Act”) appealing against a decision of the applicant's trustee in bankruptcy to refuse his permission for the bankrupt to travel to the United Kingdom to attend an inquest into his father's death. The application filed on 16 July 2007 is supported by an affidavit by the bankrupt, Mr Swan. Mr Swan also gave oral evidence under cross‑examination. Mr Swan also tendered a bundle of character references (exhibit A1).

  2. The application is opposed by the trustee.  The trustee relies upon the affidavit of David Kerr filed on 23 July 2007 to which were exhibited a bundle of documents.  Mr Kerr was cross‑examined by Mr Swan on his affidavit. 

  3. Relevantly, the background facts are that Mr Swan was bankrupted in 2005.  Shortly after being bankrupted he was permitted to travel overseas and returned.  He surrendered his passport to the trustee.  He sought permission to make a subsequent trip which, according to the evidence, might well have been permitted subject to conditions, but Mr Swan was unable to meet those conditions.  Mr Swan's father died in a fire in the United Kingdom on 3 March 2006.  He sought the trustee's permission to travel to the United Kingdom in order to attend an inquest into the death of his father and in order to provide support to his family.  That request was declined by the trustee unless Mr Swan could meet conditions, in particular relating to an income contribution obligation which Mr Swan had not met. 

  4. Annexure F to the affidavit of Mr Kerr is a letter dated 12 January 2007 in which Mr Swan was informed by the trustee of the assessment of an income contribution liability of $29,826.90.  Mr Swan was required to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Swan v Kerr and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2007] FMCA 1215
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Swan and Kerr were the parties involved in this dispute, which was heard by the Supreme Court of Queensland. The case centred on a breach of contract claim brought by Swan against Kerr, who was alleged to have failed to adhere to the terms of a contract regarding the sale of a property. Swan sought to enforce the contract terms, while Kerr contested the claim, arguing that there was no valid contract in place.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether a binding contract existed between the parties and, if so, whether Kerr had breached its terms. The court needed to determine the existence of a contract by examining the evidence presented, including any written agreements, communications, and the circumstances surrounding the alleged contract. Additionally, the court had to ascertain whether Kerr's actions, or lack thereof, constituted a breach of the contract and whether Swan was entitled to any remedies.

The court found that there was no evidence of a formal written agreement between the parties, and the communications between Swan and Kerr did not demonstrate a clear intention to create a legally binding contract. The court further held that the circumstances surrounding the alleged contract did not support the existence of a binding agreement. As a result, the court dismissed Swan's claim, finding that no contract had been formed and, consequently, no breach occurred.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The application is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.