FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SWAN v KERR | [2007] FMCA 1215 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Appeal against decision of trustee refusing permission for bankrupt to travel overseas – family commitments – inquest into the death of the bankrupt’s father – bankrupt previously travelling overseas with the consent of the trustee – public examination of the trustee revealing issues of concern to the trustee – imposition of income contributions by the trustee – non payment by the bankrupt – unresolved challenge to income contribution assessment – imposition of conditions on travel by the trustee – bankrupt living itinerant lifestyle – supported by friends and relatives – appeal dismissed. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s.178 |
| Dunwoody v Offiical Receiver [2005] FMCA 1634 ReHicks; ex Parte Lamb (1994) 217 ALR 195 |
| Applicant: | RICHARD JAMES SWAN |
| Respondent: | DAVID KERR |
| File Number: | SYG2197 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Driver FM |
| Hearing date: | 25 July 2007 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 25 July 2007 |
REPRESENTATION
The Applicant appeared in person
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Spencer |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Gadens Lawyers |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG2197 of 2007
| RICHARD JAMES SWAN |
Applicant
And
| DAVID KERR |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(revised from transcript)
I have before me an application under s.178 of the Bankruptcy Act1966 (Cth) (“the Bankruptcy Act”) appealing against a decision of the applicant's trustee in bankruptcy to refuse his permission for the bankrupt to travel to the United Kingdom to attend an inquest into his father's death. The application filed on 16 July 2007 is supported by an affidavit by the bankrupt, Mr Swan. Mr Swan also gave oral evidence under cross‑examination. Mr Swan also tendered a bundle of character references (exhibit A1).
The application is opposed by the trustee. The trustee relies upon the affidavit of David Kerr filed on 23 July 2007 to which were exhibited a bundle of documents. Mr Kerr was cross‑examined by Mr Swan on his affidavit.
Relevantly, the background facts are that Mr Swan was bankrupted in 2005. Shortly after being bankrupted he was permitted to travel overseas and returned. He surrendered his passport to the trustee. He sought permission to make a subsequent trip which, according to the evidence, might well have been permitted subject to conditions, but Mr Swan was unable to meet those conditions. Mr Swan's father died in a fire in the United Kingdom on 3 March 2006. He sought the trustee's permission to travel to the United Kingdom in order to attend an inquest into the death of his father and in order to provide support to his family. That request was declined by the trustee unless Mr Swan could meet conditions, in particular relating to an income contribution obligation which Mr Swan had not met.
Annexure F to the affidavit of Mr Kerr is a letter dated 12 January 2007 in which Mr Swan was informed by the trustee of the assessment of an income contribution liability of $29,826.90. Mr Swan was required to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Swan v Kerr and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] FMCA 1215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether a binding contract existed between the parties and, if so, whether Kerr had breached its terms. The court needed to determine the existence of a contract by examining the evidence presented, including any written agreements, communications, and the circumstances surrounding the alleged contract. Additionally, the court had to ascertain whether Kerr's actions, or lack thereof, constituted a breach of the contract and whether Swan was entitled to any remedies.
The court found that there was no evidence of a formal written agreement between the parties, and the communications between Swan and Kerr did not demonstrate a clear intention to create a legally binding contract. The court further held that the circumstances surrounding the alleged contract did not support the existence of a binding agreement. As a result, the court dismissed Swan's claim, finding that no contract had been formed and, consequently, no breach occurred.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The application is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.