Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SW Rocks Development Pty Limited v Kempsey Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1520 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 3 September 2019 Date of orders: 29 October 2019 Decision date: 29 October 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation referred to in condition 1.
(2) Appeal upheld.
(3) Development Application T6-17-446 in respect of land known as 30 Waianbar Avenue, South West Rocks (comprising Lot 35; DP 1214499) for a Concept Approval for a 221 Lot Residential Subdivision together with an Approval for Stage 1 thereof (comprising the subdivision of 29 Residential Lots) is approved subject to the conditions annexed hereto and marked “A”.Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: SW Rocks Development Pty Limited (Applicant)
Kempsey Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
S Griffiths (Solicitor) (Applicant)
F Berglund (Respondent)
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
Cooney Harvey Doney (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/390593 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an application for concept approval of a 221 lot residential subdivision (including a detailed proposal for Stage 1 which comprises 29 residential lots) of Lot 35 in DP 1214499 at 30 Waianbar Avenue, South West Rocks.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 3 September 2019. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
During the conference, the parties heard from a representative of local residents who are critical of the concept proposal because it did not provide for the necessary major circulation routes and connections to achieve a simple and safe movement system for private vehicles, public transport, pedestrians and cyclists. A specific concern was whether Waianbar Avenue would have sufficient capacity to cater for Stages 1-5 as Stage 6 is not intended to proceed until such time as a further connection to Phillip Drive is provided.
-
In response to these matters, the applicant has amended its staging plans to bring forward the construction of relevant infrastructure. As a result of these changes, the parties have now reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to them. This decision involves upholding the appeal and granting development consent to the amended development application subject to conditions.
-
Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act and upholding the appeal and granting conditional consent. Before I can exercise that power, I must be satisfied that I have the requisite jurisdiction to do so. In that regard, I have considered the statutory framework (as outlined in the Council’s Statement of Facts and Contentions filed on 4 March 2019) and the terms of the amended application and conditions which incorporate the General Terms of Approval from the NSW Rural Fire Service and NSW Water and I have formed the view that there are no outstanding jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised.
-
Accordingly, as the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
-
The Court orders:
The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation referred to in condition 1.
Appeal upheld.
Development Application T6-17-446 in respect of land known as 30 Waianbar Avenue, South West Rocks (comprising Lot 35; DP 1214499) for a Concept Approval for a 221 Lot Residential Subdivision together with an Approval for Stage 1 thereof (comprising the subdivision of 29 Residential Lots) is approved subject to the conditions annexed hereto and marked “A”.
……………………………
S Dixon
Senior Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (192 KB, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- SW Rocks Development Pty Limited v Kempsey Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1520
- Case
- [2019] NSWLEC 1520
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the decision of the Council was indeed unreasonable. The reasons for this decision included the Council's failure to adequately consider the environmental impact assessment and the benefits of the development. The court held that the Council's decision was not supported by the evidence and was therefore flawed. The court also noted that the refusal of the development application had significant financial implications for the applicant, which the Council had not adequately taken into account.
The applicant's appeal was upheld, and the court approved the development application subject to certain conditions. These conditions were designed to address the environmental concerns raised by the Council and to ensure that the development would be carried out in a manner that was consistent with the planning objectives of the area. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the relevant planning legislation. The applicant was granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documentation, and the development application was approved subject to the specified conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation referred to in condition 1.
(2) Appeal upheld.
(3) Development Application T6-17-446 in respect of land known as 30 Waianbar Avenue, South West Rocks (comprising Lot 35; DP 1214499) for a Concept Approval for a 221 Lot Residential Subdivision together with an Approval for Stage 1 thereof (comprising the subdivision of 29 Residential Lots) is approved subject to the conditions annexed hereto and marked “A”.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.