SVNB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 87
•18 MAY 2005
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SVNB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 87SVNB v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
S 283 OF 2004
MARSHALL, MANSFIELD AND STONE JJ
18 MAY 2005
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADELAIDE DISTRICT REGISTRY
S 283 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
SVNB
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENTPETER KATSAMBANIS, MEMBER REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENTPRINCIPAL MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENTJUDGES:
MARSHALL, MANSFIELD AND STONE JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
18 MAY 2005
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the application.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADELAIDE DISTRICT REGISTRY
S 283 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
SVNB
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENTPETER KATSAMBANIS, MEMBER REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENTPRINCIPAL MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGES:
MARSHALL, MANSFIELD AND STONE JJ
DATE:
18 MAY 2005
PLACE:
ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
THE COURT
Today the Court published its reasons for judgment in SVMB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 86. The applicant in this matter is the husband of the applicant in SVMB. Counsel for the parties in this matter accepted that the circumstances of this proceeding are indistinguishable from those in SVNB. Consequently the Court will make the same orders in this application as it did in SVMB for the reasons set out in that judgment.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Marshall, Mansfield and Stone. Associate:
Dated: 18 May 2005
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S Ower Solicitor for the Applicant: Winters Counsel for the Respondents: Ms S Maharaj Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore Date of Hearing: 18 May 2005 Date of Judgment: 18 May 2005
0
1
0