Susan Cavanagh v Change.Org Australia

Case [2022] FWC 2345


[2022] FWC 2345

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Susan Cavanagh
v
Change.Org Australia

(U2022/8483)

cOMMISSIONER bISSETT

MELBOURNE, 5 SEPTEMBER 2022

Application for relief from unfair dismissal – unpaid application – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 18 August 2022, Ms Susan Cavanagh (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that the Applicant did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 19 August 2022, the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address advising that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 7 calendar days, the application may be dismissed.

  1. On 23 August 2022, the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address reminding her that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received, the application may be dismissed.

  1. A final attempt to contact the Applicant on her nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 25 August 2022 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered, and a voicemail message was left advising the Applicant that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

  1. To date there has been no response from the Applicant, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1)       An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2)       The regulations may prescribe:

(a)       a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b)       a method for indexing the fee; and

(c)the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1)Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a)       the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b)       the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c)       the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

  1. Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An Order[1] to this effect will be issued shortly.


COMMISSIONER


[1] PR745475

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR745474>

Details
AGLC
Susan Cavanagh v Change.Org Australia [2022] FWC 2345
Case
[2022] FWC 2345
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) faced an application for relief from unfair dismissal from Susan Cavanagh against Change.Org Australia. The FWC had to determine whether the application complied with the necessary procedural requirements, specifically the payment of an application fee or a completed waiver form as stipulated under the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). The primary legal issue was whether the Applicant's failure to comply with the fee requirement justified the dismissal of her application under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

The FWC examined whether the Applicant's application was made in accordance with the FW Act, considering the mandatory requirement for payment of the application fee or a waiver form. Despite multiple attempts to contact the Applicant and warnings that the application might be dismissed if the fee was not paid or a waiver form submitted, no action was taken by the Applicant. The Commission concluded that the application was not made in accordance with the Act due to the outstanding fee and lack of a waiver form. Consequently, the FWC found that the application had no reasonable prospects of success, and it was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

The FWC ordered the dismissal of Susan Cavanagh's application for unfair dismissal. This decision was based on the Applicant's failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the FW Act by not paying the required application fee or submitting a completed waiver form. The Commission issued an Order to this effect, finalising the dismissal of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.