FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SURRIDGE & SURRIDGE & ANOR | [2016] FamCA 615 |
| FAMILY LAW – COSTS – where enforcement application for child support arrears – where application for husband to procure removal of caveat over property lodged in breach of orders – where consideration of general principles – where husband to pay 80 per cent of wife’s costs as assessed or agreed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117 |
| Hawkins & Roe [2012] FamCAFC |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Surridge |
| 1st RESPONDENT: | Mr Surridge |
| 2nd RESPONDENT: | Mr Q |
| FILE NUMBER: | PAC | 4412 | of | 2012 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 29 July 2016 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Parramatta |
| PLACE HEARD: | Parramatta |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Foster J |
| HEARING DATE: | 24 June 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Gillies |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE 1ST RESPONDENT: | Tilley Family Law and Mediation |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE 4TH RESPONDENT: | Tilley Family Law and Mediation |
Orders
That the husband pay 80 per cent of the wife’s costs on a party/party basis as assessed or agreed in relation to the subject proceedings within 2 months from such assessment or agreement.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Surridge & Surridge and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
FILE NUMBER: PAC 4412 of 2012
| Ms Surridge |
Applicant
And
| Mr Surridge and Mr Q |
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Property proceedings between the husband and wife were the subject of orders made on 29 June 2015 (Surridge & Surridge [2015] FamCA 493).
Those orders provided:
By Consent:
(1) That the parties forthwith do all acts and things and sign all documents to cause the following things to occur with respect to the company [B Pty Ltd]:
(a) The 2013 and 2014 statements of financial position to be amended so as to consolidate into one loan account in the joint names of the parties all advances and loan accounts of the parties reported in the statements of financial position;
(b) Dividends then to be declared to each of the parties fully franked for each of the following financial years:
(i) For the 2013 financial year $37,479 imputation credit and $87,452 franked amount;
(ii) For the 2014 financial year $15,366 imputation credit and $35,855 franked amount;
(iii) For the 2015 financial year $115,505 fully franked;
(c) That on the dividends being declared and the 2015 financial statements and tax return prepared…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Surridge and Surridge and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] FamCA 615
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the appropriate allocation of costs between the parties following the conclusion of the subject proceedings. Specifically, the court was required to determine the proportion of the wife's costs that the husband should be ordered to pay on a party/party basis.
Foster J ordered that the husband pay 80 per cent of the wife’s costs on a party/party basis. These costs are to be assessed or agreed upon and paid by the husband within two months of such assessment or agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the husband pay 80 per cent of the wife’s costs on a party/party basis as assessed or agreed in relation to the subject proceedings within 2 months from such assessment or agreement.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.