Suriyo (Migration)
[2017] AATA 2449
•24 November 2017
Suriyo (Migration) [2017] AATA 2449 (24 November 2017)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Miss Kodchakorn Suriyo
CASE NUMBER: 1612377
DIBP REFERENCE(S): CLF2013/4276 CLF2013/42761
MEMBER:Helena Claringbold
DATE:24 November 2017
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Statement made on 24 November 2017 at 7:34am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa – Subclass 801 (Spouse) – Non-attendance at hearingLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 362B(1A(b), 362C(5)STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration on 25 July 2016 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) Subclass 801 visa under the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
On 9 November 2017, the Tribunal dismissed the application under s.362B(1A)(b) of the Act as the review applicant did not appear before it to give evidence and present arguments at the time and date of the scheduled hearing.
The review applicant was notified of the dismissal decision and given a copy of a written statement setting out the decision and the reasons for the decision, in accordance with s.362C(5). The review applicant was advised that reinstatement of the application could be sought within 14 days of receiving the dismissal statement and that a failure to apply for reinstatement within the 14 day period would result in confirmation of the dismissal decision.
As the review applicant did not apply for reinstatement of the application within the 14 days period, the Tribunal must confirm the decision to dismiss the application. In these circumstances, the decision under review is taken to be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal confirms the decision to dismiss the application.
Helena Claringbold
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0