Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Surf All Day Pty Ltd ACN 627 817 181 v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1366 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 June 2024 Date of orders: 02 July 2024 Decision date: 02 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Walsh C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to file the further and amended material specified in Annexure A.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment to DA0619/22 pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development Application No DA0619/22 (as amended) for development described as a two lot subdivision of an existing lot and the construction of multi dwelling housing comprising 5 single storey dwellings and earthworks on land legally described as Lot 82 DP 614216 known as 54 Hawdon Street, Moruya, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the condition of consent in Annexure B.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 38
Eurobodalla Local Environmental Plan 2022, cll 2.6, 5.21, 6.9
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Surf All Day Pty Ltd ACN 627 817 181 (Applicant)
Eurobodalla Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
R White (Applicant)
D Gunter (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Kamy Saeedi Law (Applicant)
Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/75396 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: These proceedings, brought under Class 1 of the Court’s jurisdiction, relate to an appeal pursuant to s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the respondent’s refusal of development application number DA0619/22 (DA) with respect to land legally described as Lot 82, DP 614216 and known as 54 Hawdon Street, Moruya (site). The DA sought consent for a two-lot subdivision to create a residential lot for the existing dwelling house on the site and a larger lot for the development of multi dwelling housing comprising 5 single storey dwellings.
Conciliation and agreement between the parties
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference between the parties under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act), which was held on 20 June 2024. I presided over the conciliation conference. Prior to the conference the parties had filed an agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision would have the Court upholding the appeal, subject to amended plans, and granting consent to the DA subject to agreed conditions.
-
Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the…
Continue reading Surf All Day Pty Ltd ACN 627 817 181 v Eurobodalla Shire Cou...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Surf All Day Pty Ltd ACN 627 817 181 v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1366
- Case
- [2024] NSWLEC 1366
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether Surf All Day Pty Ltd should be granted leave to amend their development application, assess the merits of the amended application, and decide on the appropriate conditions for consent. The primary legal issue was whether the amendment to the development application was substantive and would significantly alter the nature of the proposed development, thus requiring additional assessment and public notification.
The court found that the amendment to the development application was not substantive and did not significantly change the nature of the proposed development. Therefore, the applicant was granted leave to amend their application without the need for additional public notification. The court further determined that the amended application met the requirements of the relevant planning legislation and should be approved, subject to specified conditions that addressed environmental and community concerns. The appeal against the initial refusal of consent was upheld, and the development application was granted consent with the outlined conditions.
In summary, the court granted leave for the applicant to amend their development application, approved the amended application subject to conditions, and ordered that the applicant pay the council's costs related to the amendment. The court's decision ensures that the development can proceed while addressing the council's concerns about the environmental and community impact.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to file the further and amended material specified in Annexure A.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment to DA0619/22 pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development Application No DA0619/22 (as amended) for development described as a two lot subdivision of an existing lot and the construction of multi dwelling housing comprising 5 single storey dwellings and earthworks on land legally described as Lot 82 DP 614216 known as 54 Hawdon Street, Moruya, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the condition of consent in Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.