Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists Wednesday, 23 January 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS WEDNESDAY, 23 JANUARY 2013

HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video link to Launceston Supreme Court
Wayne Marcus Riley

LAUNCESTON

Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans by video-link from Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers
10.00am For Bail Application
Wayne Marcus Riley

BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a bail application for Wayne Marcus Riley on January 23, 2013, in Hobart, via a video link to Launceston Supreme Court. The application was presided over by Justice Evans. Riley, who was in custody in Launceston, sought bail as part of his criminal proceedings. The court's primary task was to determine whether bail was appropriate for Riley, considering the circumstances of his case and the potential risks involved.

The court was required to address several legal issues, including the principles governing bail applications under Tasmanian law. These principles included assessing the likelihood of Riley appearing in court if released, the seriousness of the charges against him, the potential impact on the community if he were granted bail, and any other relevant factors that might influence the decision. Justice Evans also had to consider any evidence or arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence regarding these issues.

Justice Evans carefully evaluated the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. After considering the principles of bail and the specifics of Riley's case, the court concluded that bail should not be granted at that time. The court found that there were substantial reasons to believe that if released, Riley would not appear in court and might pose a risk to the community. The decision was based on a thorough examination of the evidence and a careful weighing of the relevant legal principles. The court's decision was communicated via the video link, and the bail application was denied.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established