Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists Friday, 25 January 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 3

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FRIDAY, 25 JANUARY 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.  

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Bevan Parkinson

Corey Brooke

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston until further notice.

BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists Friday, 25 January 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 3
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Justice Evans, heard a bail application on 25 January 2013. The applicants, Bevan Parkinson and Corey Brooke, were seeking release from custody. The nature of their criminal charges and the circumstances surrounding their detention were not disclosed in the provided text, as the publication of certain details was restricted by law. The application took place in Hobart, with no other listed matters for Launceston or Burnie at that time.

The legal issues before the court involved determining whether the applicants met the criteria for bail as set out in the Bail Act. This included assessing the seriousness of the alleged offences, the likelihood of the applicants attending court if released, and the risk they might pose to the community or interfere with witnesses. The court had to weigh these factors against the presumption of innocence and the applicants' right to liberty.

Justice Evans considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, including any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The court's reasoning and the outcome of the bail application were not detailed in the provided text, as it was either not permitted by law or not included in the excerpt. The final orders regarding the bail application would have been communicated directly to the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.