Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 9 September 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 9 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.00 p.m.
For Judgment
Alan Quarmby
v
Barrie Graeme Oakley and anor

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(part-heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Application
Copping Refuse Disposal Site Joint Authority
v
Southern Beaches Conservation Society Inc & anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Kyle Thomas-Fitzpatrick

2.15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Aaron Salvesen

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Robert Raymond Kaye

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Brodie Leigh Price
(part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Motion to Review via video link from
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Shane Murray Brown v Senior Sergeant John Parker and Anor

LAUNCESTON

COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall

COURT 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)

Louise Jane Williams

Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Motion to Review via video link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shane Murray Brown v Senior Sergeant John Parker and Anor

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law lists for 9 September 2015 reveal a diverse array of cases scheduled for various stages of proceedings. One notable civil case is Alan Quarmby versus Barrie Graeme Oakley and another, set for judgment at 2:00 p.m. in Court 7. This case likely involves a dispute between the parties, possibly concerning contractual obligations, property rights, or personal injury claims. The court's decision will hinge on interpreting relevant legal principles and evidence presented during the trial.

The criminal cases listed for the same day highlight the court's role in maintaining public order and addressing criminal conduct. The trial of The Queen versus Russell David Potter, set for 9:45 a.m. in Court 1, will determine the accused's guilt or innocence in relation to criminal charges. This trial will involve examining the prosecution's evidence and the defence's arguments, with the court applying the principles of criminal law to reach a verdict. Another significant case is the part-heard matter of Mures Fishing Pty Ltd, indicating that the proceedings are in progress, and the court will continue to deliberate on the issues presented.

In addition to the primary cases, the law lists include applications and bail hearings, demonstrating the court's active management of various legal matters. For instance, the application by Copping Refuse Disposal Site Joint Authority against Southern Beaches Conservation Society Inc and another, scheduled for 4:15 p.m. in Court 7, likely involves environmental or planning issues. The court's role in such cases is to resolve disputes by interpreting relevant legislation and assessing the merits of the parties' arguments. Similarly, the bail applications for Kyle Thomas-Fitzpatrick and Aaron Salvesen, set for 2:15 p.m. and 4:15 p.m., respectively, in Court 7, involve determining whether the accused should be released from custody pending trial, with considerations of flight risk, community ties, and the nature of the charges.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law lists for 9 September 2015 reflect the court's diverse responsibilities in civil and criminal matters, showcasing its role in resolving disputes, upholding the law, and ensuring justice is served.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established