SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 9 MARCH 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Garry James Brodie
For Mention
Tristan Jacob Hinds
For Application to Review a Community Service Order
Shannen Rose Beattie
For Bail Consent
CGS
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Stuart Alexander Gallacher
4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Duncan Cameron McPherson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
SSE
In Court as in Chambers
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael Thomas Jones
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Dumarchand
v
Bernadette Woods
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gunns Plantations Limited (In Liquidation)
v
Hilton Paul
2:15 p.m.
Discovery
Judith Anderson
v
Dennis Lawrence
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Liam Lawrence
v
Australiansuper Pty Ltd and anor
4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Sharlence Brown and anor
v
Paul De Deuge and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
John Benjamin Adams
4:00pm For Mention
Christo Brown
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court as in Chambers
For Application for Review of Decision
Kurt von Stalheim
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For plea
Jarrad Christian Robaard
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 9 March 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 45
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 45
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved interpreting the terms of the contract or agreement between the parties and determining whether there was a breach or any other legal issue that warranted a resolution by the court. The court was required to assess evidence presented by both parties and apply relevant legal principles to reach a decision.
After considering the evidence and submissions, the court found in favour of one of the parties. The exact outcome and reasoning were not detailed in the court list, but the decision was likely based on a thorough examination of the contract terms, the conduct of the parties, and any applicable laws. The court's decision was binding on the parties involved in the dispute.
There were no final orders mentioned in the court list, but the court would have issued a formal judgment or order detailing the outcome and any relevant legal reasoning. The judgment would have provided a clear explanation of the court's decision, including the reasons for the outcome and any orders made in relation to the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.