Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 8 August 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 8 AUGUST 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2.00 p.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
RWB

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow
(Part-Heard)

10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Tamara Jayne Gallahar
Mathew Wayne Tennant

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Andrew Bruce Newton

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
IPP

(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.

For Sentence

Blake Cameron McPherson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Michael John Spaulding
V
Colin Bertram Adams

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.

Via video link to Launceston

For Judgment
Gunns Limited v Tasmanian Conservation Trust Inc

SECS Management Pty Ltd v George Town Council
Gail Maree Archer v George Town Council

Simon William Dudley and Helen Elizabeth Dudley v Building Appeal Board, Department of Justice

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11.00 a.m.
Amend Defence
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
V
Morley

12.00 p.m.
Separate Issues
Nelson
V
Ludbey & Ors

2.15 p.m.
Set down for Hearing
Piuselli
V
Tasmania Perpetual Trustees Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent

Civil Jurisdiction

9.30am In Court
For Admission
Felicity Anne Radin

Criminal Jurisdiction

9.45am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Joshua David Salter

10.00am For Plea
Allison May Howe
Rebecca Therese Tilbury
Cornelius John Richard Gleeson
Justin Donald Brazendale
JCR

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Blow

Civil Jurisdiction

4.30pm For Judgment by video-link from Court 3, Supreme Court, Hobart
Gunns Ltd v Tasmanian Conservation Trust Inc
SECS Management Pty Ltd v George Town Council
Gail Maree Archer v George Town Council
Simon William Dudley and Helen Elizabeth Dudley v Building Appeal Board, Department of Justice

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 am
For Trial (Part-Heard)

Darryl John Heard

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear several cases on 8 August 2012. In the Court of Criminal Appeal, the Director of Public Prosecutions presented a case against a defendant identified as RWB. The legal dispute involved a criminal matter that required the court to consider the prosecution's arguments and the defendant's defence. Other cases scheduled for the day included both criminal and civil trials, mentions, and sentencing hearings. In Launceston, the court was to deliver judgments on cases involving Gunns Limited v Tasmanian Conservation Trust Inc, SECS Management Pty Ltd v George Town Council, and others, via video link from Hobart. These cases involved complex legal issues such as environmental law, planning law, and local government disputes.

The court was tasked with resolving significant legal issues, including the interpretation and application of criminal law in the case against RWB. For the civil cases, the court had to address questions of environmental impact, planning permissions, and statutory compliance. The cases in Launceston required the court to consider the legal validity of planning decisions and the rights of private entities against public interests. The outcomes of these cases could have far-reaching implications for property development, environmental regulation, and local government powers.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's proceedings on 8 August 2012 reflected a broad spectrum of legal issues, from criminal proceedings to intricate civil disputes. The Court of Criminal Appeal dealt with the prosecution of RWB, while other cases involved significant legal questions about planning and environmental law. The court's decisions in these matters would provide clarity on the interpretation and application of relevant statutes and regulations, impacting both public and private interests. The outcomes of these cases highlighted the court's role in resolving complex legal disputes and ensuring the proper administration of justice.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established