Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 8 April 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 61


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 8 APRIL 2015

HOBART

No Law List for Hobart

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness

BURNIE

No Law List for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 8 April 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 61
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 61
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Launceston, a criminal case was heard before Justice Pearce on Wednesday, 8 April 2015. The case involved an individual identified by the initials A Witness, who was subject to a mention related to their criminal proceedings. The specific nature of the criminal matter and the reasons for the mention were not detailed in the provided extract.

The court was required to determine the procedural steps that would be taken in relation to the mention of the defendant A Witness. This likely involved addressing any outstanding issues or scheduling updates pertaining to the criminal case against the defendant. The legal issues encompassed the interpretation and application of criminal procedural law to ensure that the defendant's rights were protected while the court proceeded with the case.

Justice Pearce provided a ruling that was presumably in line with the applicable criminal procedural law. The court's reasoning and the outcome were not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but the mention would typically involve decisions about the scheduling of further hearings, the status of any pleas, or other administrative matters necessary for the progression of the case. The final orders would have been communicated to the parties involved, guiding them on the next steps in the criminal proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.