Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 7 May 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 7 MAY 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Beau Vaughan Plowman

For Trial
BAS
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Darren Stephen Saward
Haralambos Tymbas

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Gaye Sansom
v
C McKenzie – Member Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
O’Hair
v
AMACA Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
JCS

4:00pm For Decision
Jordan Charles Garcie v Sergeant Gary Lusted

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Jamie Lawrance Carrick
Janene Lois Perry
TJMB
David William Roles

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
LJA
Adrian Graeme Mundy
Michael James Bunch
Noel Marcus Smith
KA

For Plea
Hayden Murray Saunders
Mark Christopher Bramich
Luke Anthony Abraham aka Shane Mark Ivey
Leighton Allan Stokes

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of criminal and civil cases over two days in May 2014. In the criminal division, cases were heard in both Hobart and Launceston. The first case in Hobart involved an application for bail by Darren Stephen Saward Haralambos Tymbas, while a part-heard trial involving Stephen Roy Standage was also listed. In Launceston, Jordan Charles Garcie faced a decision in his case against Sergeant Gary Lusted, and JCS was scheduled for trial. In the civil division, Gaye Sansom sought to challenge a decision of the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal, and O’Hair had a directions hearing by telephone in their case against AMACA Pty Ltd.

The legal issues before the court involved the assessment of bail applications, the progress of ongoing trials, and the resolution of disputes between parties. In the criminal cases, the court was required to consider whether the applicants were suitable for bail and whether the trials could proceed as scheduled. In the civil cases, the court needed to determine the validity of the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal’s decision and provide directions in a telephone hearing. The reasoning and outcomes of these cases would depend on the evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved.

The court's decisions were recorded in the law lists but detailed outcomes were not provided in the extract. The cases were scheduled for specific times and dates, with some hearings taking place in chambers or by telephone. Further information on the decisions would require access to the court’s written reasons or judgments, which are typically published separately.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the extract, but it is expected that the court would provide detailed orders in its written judgments, addressing the specific issues and legal principles applicable to each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established