SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 6 MARCH 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Nathan James Carins
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
Before Justice BLOW
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Ian Robert Cooksey
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Peter Stephen Bomford
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Pre-Trial Conference
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
4:30 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Rhys Alan Felmingham
v
Graeme John Fish
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Waller
v
Stack & Anor
2.15 p.m.
Discovery
Dimmick
v
Coad
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Joshua Daniel Wilson
2.15pm Application For Bail
Corey Bamber Brooke
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Mention
Alan Arkinstall
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Tamyka Lea Buchanan
Magistrates Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.00 p.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and Ors
v
Gordian Runoff Limited
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 6 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 30
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 30
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court varied across the different matters. In the criminal cases, the court had to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals, and in the civil case, issues such as discovery and disputed facts hearings were central. Each case presented unique circumstances that required careful consideration of evidence and legal principles to arrive at a fair and just outcome. The court’s role was to interpret the law, apply it to the facts of each case, and ensure that the legal process was followed correctly.
The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not detailed in the document, as the list primarily provided information about the schedule and nature of the hearings. The court's decisions would be documented in subsequent judgments or orders, which would be available in the official records. The court’s role was to ensure that each case was heard fairly and that justice was served in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.