SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 6 AUGUST 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Shaun Michael Kelly
In Court as in Chambers
To Follow
For Bail Variation
Mahad Ahmed Mohamud
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer
David William Michaelson
For Trial
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Mention via video link
David William Roles
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
Chamber Matter
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
In the matter of an Application by Tamara Walton and Fraser Hopwood and
Rule 623 of the Rules of the Supreme Court
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial
Christopher James Barron
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
10.00 am
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Lauren Cannell v Roseanne Amanda Hughes
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 6 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 154
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 154
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose from these cases would have involved examining the facts and circumstances of each defendant's case, the evidence presented, and the applicable laws and precedents. For sentencing, the court would consider factors such as the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. In bail variation applications, the court would assess whether the current bail conditions were sufficient or needed adjustment based on new information or changed circumstances. Trials would involve determining the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the evidence and arguments presented.
The court's reasoning and outcome would have depended on the specific facts of each case, the evidence presented, and the legal arguments made by the parties involved. The final orders would reflect the court's decision based on its assessment of the evidence and the law. For example, in sentencing, the court might impose a custodial sentence, community service order, or another form of punishment. For bail variations, the court might approve the variation, maintain the existing bail conditions, or impose new conditions. In trials, the court would either acquit the defendant or find them guilty and impose a sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.