Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 5 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 5 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Michael Richard Tierney and Suzanne Joy Williamson
v
Ian Douglas Helmond

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
National Australia Bank
v
O’Dwyer

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Michael Richard Tierney and Suzanne Joy Williamson against Ian Douglas Helmond. The dispute pertains to a matter that required directions to be set. In a separate matter, National Australia Bank was a party against O’Dwyer, but the hearing was not listed in the court’s schedule.

The legal issues addressed by the court involved the setting of directions for the case between Tierney, Williamson, and Helmond. The court had to determine the procedural steps and timelines required to facilitate the resolution of the dispute between the parties. The case between the National Australia Bank and O’Dwyer, although listed, did not have a hearing scheduled, indicating that the procedural aspects or substantive issues in this matter were yet to be resolved or were being managed outside of the court's scheduled hearings.

Justice Tennent, overseeing the directions hearing, provided guidance on the procedural aspects of the case involving Tierney, Williamson, and Helmond. The court set forth a clear direction on the next steps to be taken by the parties, ensuring that the case could proceed efficiently towards resolution. The court's decision facilitated the establishment of a timeline and the identification of key procedural milestones for the case. The final orders detailed the specific steps the parties must undertake and the deadlines by which these must be met, aiming to streamline the litigation process and reach a timely resolution.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established