Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 4 September 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 4 SEPTEMBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Yonnie Judith Kiel

For Trial
Shane Douglas Glover

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
MDM
SWDM
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 p.m.
For sentence via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
David Robert Gross

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30am For Sentence
Rhys Albert Tapp

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Stewart George Pyers

Civil Jurisdiction
In Chambers via telephone
4.00pm For Directions Hearing
In the matter of an application by Joanne Frances Matthews

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt by video-link from the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm For Sentence
David Robert Gross

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
10:00 a.m.
In Court
For Mention
Mark Raymond Roland
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

Plea
Michael Ellis Bilsborrow

For Trial
Gregory Richard Fox

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Yonnie Judith Kiel appeared before Justice Porter of the Supreme Court of Tasmania for a mention regarding a criminal matter. The specifics of the dispute were not detailed in the provided excerpt. The next case, involving Shane Douglas Glover, was for a trial which had been partially heard. The legal issues in Glover's case likely involved the interpretation of evidence presented, the admissibility of certain testimonies, and the application of relevant criminal statutes to the facts as presented.

The court had to consider how the evidence and arguments aligned with the legal standards required to reach a verdict. The court's reasoning and outcome would have been influenced by the procedural fairness of the trial, the weight of the evidence, and any legal precedents that applied to the case. The final orders would have been made after careful deliberation on these matters. The court's decision would determine whether Glover's case proceeded to a full trial, was dismissed, or required further legal arguments.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established