Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 4 April 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 4 APRIL 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.

For Plea

TJP

Application under Sentencing Act 1997
Gavin Raymond McIntosh

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent

9:30am
For Trial
(Part Heard)
Daniel James Latimore

10:00am
For Sentence
Jacqueline Myree Johnson
Casey William Edward Ditcham

For Application
Loretta Ann Brooks

For Legal Argument
Tina Louise Jackson

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania provided a list of cases scheduled for Wednesday, 4 April 2012. In the criminal jurisdiction, there was a plea hearing for a TJP application under the Sentencing Act 1997, involving Gavin Raymond McIntosh, before Justice Wood. In the civil jurisdiction, there was a part-heard trial involving Clarence City Council and Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors, before Justice Evans. There were no cases listed for Launceston, but for Burnie, there was a part-heard trial for Daniel James Latimore, before Justice Tennent, followed by sentencing hearings for Jacqueline Myree Johnson, Casey William Edward Ditcham, and Loretta Ann Brooks. Tina Louise Jackson was scheduled for legal argument.

The legal issues in these cases varied based on the nature of the proceedings. The TJP application would involve considerations of sentencing principles and alternatives, while the civil trial would likely involve disputes over property or contractual obligations. The sentencing hearings would involve the application of sentencing laws and the consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors. The legal argument for Tina Louise Jackson would focus on the interpretation and application of relevant laws to her case.

The court provided a detailed list of cases scheduled for the day, indicating the type of proceedings and the parties involved. The cases covered both criminal and civil jurisdictions, with a range of proceedings from plea hearings to sentencing and trials. The court provided a structured and organised approach to the administration of justice, ensuring that each case received appropriate attention and consideration. The final orders and outcomes of the cases would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented during the proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established