Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 30 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 30 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw

For Bail Consent
Beau Vaughan Plowman

For Trial
Patrick John Gadd
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link
Jamie Reginald Hall
Garry Scott Sullivan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Trial
In the Matter of the Estate of the late William Barclay Smith
and P M, G D and R B Smith
v
J W Smith and R E Davey
and
S A Smith
and
J W Smith
(Part-heard)

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via videolink to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Leah Jean Woolley

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim/Discovery
Howlett and Anor
v
Blissenden and Ors

4:00 p.m.
For Judgment (extend time/renew writ)
Varga
v
Mandapati and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Michael Anthony Bell

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence via video-link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Leah Jean Woolley

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Philip Keith Nichols
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard various cases on Wednesday, 30 April 2014, with a range of criminal and civil matters listed for mention, bail, trial, and sentencing. The cases included a bail application by Beau Vaughan Plowman, a trial for Patrick John Gadd, and a sentence for Leah Jean Woolley, among others. Each case was assigned to a specific court and justice, with some proceedings conducted via video link.

The legal issues in these cases varied widely, encompassing bail applications, the admissibility of evidence in criminal trials, and estate disputes in civil matters. For instance, in the case of Patrick John Gadd, the court needed to determine whether certain evidence was admissible under the rules of evidence, particularly focusing on its relevance and potential prejudicial impact. In the civil matter concerning the estate of the late William Barclay Smith, the court had to resolve disputes among the beneficiaries regarding the distribution of the estate.

The court's reasoning in each case reflected a careful consideration of the relevant laws and precedents. In the criminal cases, the justices paid close attention to the principles of natural justice and the preservation of the accused's rights. For example, in the bail application for Beau Vaughan Plowman, Justice WOOD considered the risk of flight, the likelihood of reoffending, and the impact on the community. In the civil case concerning the estate of William Barclay Smith, Justice PORTER evaluated the evidence presented by the parties and applied established principles of estate law to reach a decision.

The final orders in these cases included granting or denying bail, continuing or concluding trials, and determining sentences. For instance, Leah Jean Woolley was sentenced via video link, reflecting the court's approach to balancing the need for judicial efficiency with the rights of the accused. In the civil case, the court issued orders regarding the amendment of statements of claim and the extension of time for certain legal actions.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established